<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XDV versus CDZ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-833172</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 04:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-833172</guid>
		<description>@Slacker: This topic is definitely worth a revisit. CDZ is a completely different beast now compared to what it was when I first wrote this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Slacker: This topic is definitely worth a revisit. CDZ is a completely different beast now compared to what it was when I first wrote this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slacker</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-831481</link>
		<dc:creator>Slacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-831481</guid>
		<description>Also, I&#039;m finding that the recent drop serves as a good catalyst to re-examine my portfolio allocation in my taxable account.  Not out of fear, but most of my capital gain had been wiped out, and some even have capital loss.  Good opportunity to start fresh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I&#8217;m finding that the recent drop serves as a good catalyst to re-examine my portfolio allocation in my taxable account.  Not out of fear, but most of my capital gain had been wiped out, and some even have capital loss.  Good opportunity to start fresh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slacker</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-831479</link>
		<dc:creator>Slacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-831479</guid>
		<description>Worth a revisit?

XDV: yield = 6.8%, MER = 0.50%
CDZ: yield = 3.2%, MER = 0.66%

I currently have CDZ in a non-registered account, but considering switching over to XDV for the higher yield, and better tax treatment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth a revisit?</p>
<p>XDV: yield = 6.8%, MER = 0.50%<br />
CDZ: yield = 3.2%, MER = 0.66%</p>
<p>I currently have CDZ in a non-registered account, but considering switching over to XDV for the higher yield, and better tax treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosi</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-635882</link>
		<dc:creator>rosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-635882</guid>
		<description>Love to have more information on Claymore (CDZ) &amp; their DRIP&#039;s program</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love to have more information on Claymore (CDZ) &amp; their DRIP&#8217;s program</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-270118</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-270118</guid>
		<description>Update: XDV also now pays monthly dividends, and over the past 2 years (in recession), both CDZ and XDV have done pretty well, however, XDV currently only yields 2.29% while CDZ yields 4.27%. Low volume of CDZ is definitely an issue. Still unsure which to keep or to keep both in the coming years.

Also, plan to open a TFSA account at QT so that can keep these in that account as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: XDV also now pays monthly dividends, and over the past 2 years (in recession), both CDZ and XDV have done pretty well, however, XDV currently only yields 2.29% while CDZ yields 4.27%. Low volume of CDZ is definitely an issue. Still unsure which to keep or to keep both in the coming years.</p>
<p>Also, plan to open a TFSA account at QT so that can keep these in that account as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonV</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-203931</link>
		<dc:creator>RonV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-203931</guid>
		<description>Why would you add this to your RRSP? You lose the dividend tax credit. Better to hold it within a non-registered portfolio and leave the bonds/GICs to the RRSP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you add this to your RRSP? You lose the dividend tax credit. Better to hold it within a non-registered portfolio and leave the bonds/GICs to the RRSP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtS</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-201698</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-201698</guid>
		<description>Claymore now has a DRIP as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claymore now has a DRIP as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-179061</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-179061</guid>
		<description>I use Questrade to trade securities, and QT has a DRIP plan in which if the dividends received at any time are greater than the value of the security then QT automatically buys the whole shares from the dividends received.

Since CDZ has monthly dividends at around 7 cents a share, usually, with the amount that I would have invested (100 shares for example) will not be enough to automatically reinvest my dividends when I do receive the dividends. If I had 1000 shares, QT would have bought 4 shares automatically. At the same price for XDV, that gives out quarterly shares, at 100 shares, QT would have automatically bought 1 extra share for me every 3 months, or at 1000 shares, it would have bought around 14-15 shares for me automatically without any extra fees.

So, if my goal is long-term investment with dividend re-investment, then XDV is probably a better choice. But then again this situation is only applicable if you are using a broker like QT that offers that kind of a plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Questrade to trade securities, and QT has a DRIP plan in which if the dividends received at any time are greater than the value of the security then QT automatically buys the whole shares from the dividends received.</p>
<p>Since CDZ has monthly dividends at around 7 cents a share, usually, with the amount that I would have invested (100 shares for example) will not be enough to automatically reinvest my dividends when I do receive the dividends. If I had 1000 shares, QT would have bought 4 shares automatically. At the same price for XDV, that gives out quarterly shares, at 100 shares, QT would have automatically bought 1 extra share for me every 3 months, or at 1000 shares, it would have bought around 14-15 shares for me automatically without any extra fees.</p>
<p>So, if my goal is long-term investment with dividend re-investment, then XDV is probably a better choice. But then again this situation is only applicable if you are using a broker like QT that offers that kind of a plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blitzkrieg</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-162412</link>
		<dc:creator>Blitzkrieg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-162412</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the relatively low volume of CDZ a problem? I notice the spread can be quite large. I like the methodology of CDZ more than XDV, but the low volume makes me reluctant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the relatively low volume of CDZ a problem? I notice the spread can be quite large. I like the methodology of CDZ more than XDV, but the low volume makes me reluctant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JShah</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/xdv-versus-cdz/#comment-12161</link>
		<dc:creator>JShah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/22/xdv-versus-cdz#comment-12161</guid>
		<description>Are people of the same view for CDZ after tax changes for income trust ? i.e. is XDV now more preferable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are people of the same view for CDZ after tax changes for income trust ? i.e. is XDV now more preferable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

