<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Stock Market Predictions are Useless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Why Stock Market Predictions are Useless &#124; Canadian Capitalist -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-241655</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Why Stock Market Predictions are Useless &#124; Canadian Capitalist -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-241655</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tim West, Barrie Conrod. Barrie Conrod said: Why Stock Market Predictions are Useless http://ow.ly/2n40w [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tim West, Barrie Conrod. Barrie Conrod said: Why Stock Market Predictions are Useless <a href="http://ow.ly/2n40w" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/2n40w</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-194701</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-194701</guid>
		<description>Update: July 1, 2009.

In July 1996, the year of &quot;irrational exuberance&quot;, I predicted a stock market crash in August, 2009. 

Thirteen years later, how do I feel now?

Many people think that the worst is over and that we can look forward to the next bull wave in the global markets.

There was similar sentiment in 2007, when I, along with approximately fifteen percent of the analysts worldwide, disagreed.

I disagree again and stick with my original prediction, which I published nationally in our country back then.

The only correction I would like to make is that I could be a few weeks early. With six weeks to go, I now think that it could possibly be the end of August 2009 or possibly early September. Otherwise, take a seat with me and watch again how the planets affect the markets.

For more regarding my predictions of the semi-crash of 2008 ten months before the event, as well as a the flu pandemic of 2009/2010 and the major war coming up in 2010, please visit http://www.luckydays.tv/stock-market-predictions-for-2007-2008.html and http://www.luckydays.tv/coming-stock-market-crash.html

I have disseminated this information for well over a decade now at my own cost in the hope that others may also be amazed by the influence of the planets in our lives.

Scientists, please have a look beyond your newspaper column assessments of the subject.

Thank you.
Adrian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: July 1, 2009.</p>
<p>In July 1996, the year of &#8220;irrational exuberance&#8221;, I predicted a stock market crash in August, 2009. </p>
<p>Thirteen years later, how do I feel now?</p>
<p>Many people think that the worst is over and that we can look forward to the next bull wave in the global markets.</p>
<p>There was similar sentiment in 2007, when I, along with approximately fifteen percent of the analysts worldwide, disagreed.</p>
<p>I disagree again and stick with my original prediction, which I published nationally in our country back then.</p>
<p>The only correction I would like to make is that I could be a few weeks early. With six weeks to go, I now think that it could possibly be the end of August 2009 or possibly early September. Otherwise, take a seat with me and watch again how the planets affect the markets.</p>
<p>For more regarding my predictions of the semi-crash of 2008 ten months before the event, as well as a the flu pandemic of 2009/2010 and the major war coming up in 2010, please visit <a href="http://www.luckydays.tv/stock-market-predictions-for-2007-2008.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.luckydays.tv/stock-market-predictions-for-2007-2008.html</a> and <a href="http://www.luckydays.tv/coming-stock-market-crash.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.luckydays.tv/coming-stock-market-crash.html</a></p>
<p>I have disseminated this information for well over a decade now at my own cost in the hope that others may also be amazed by the influence of the planets in our lives.</p>
<p>Scientists, please have a look beyond your newspaper column assessments of the subject.</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Adrian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-155317</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-155317</guid>
		<description>The Sun-Jupiter Opposition Dates 1970-2035 
(Note: The severity rating was calculated using some basic zodiacal rules. 
For more details regarding this, click here.) 

The markets generally drop noticeably in the 10 days leading into the dates given below.
If they haven&#039;t yet dropped by this date, they often drop exactly on the date or or the day after. 
Consider Selling the markets short up to 10 days before these dates. 
(The 19 October 1987 crash and several others have begun on a Sun-Jupiter opposition) 




Date (d/m/y) Severity Rating Date (d/m/y) Severity Rating 

21/04/1970 ****** 28/11/2000 **** 
23/05/1971 ****** 01/01/2002 ******* 
24/06/1972 ******* 02/02/2003 ***** 
26/07/1973 *** 03/03/2004 ***** 
05/09/1974 *** 04/04/2005 ****** 
13/10/1975 ***** 04/05/2006 *** 
18/11/1976 *** 05/06/2007 **** 
22/12/1977 ***** 09/07/2008 ******* 
24/01/1979 *** 14/08/2009 ********** (Friday) 
24/02/1980 ***** 18/09/2010 *** 
26/03/1981 *** 28/10/2011 ******** (Friday) 
25/04/1982 *** 02/12/2012 ** 
27/05/1983 **** 08/01/2014 *** 
29/06/1984 **** 06/02/2015 ***** 
04/08/1985 ** 08/03/2016 **** 
10/09/1986 **** 07/04/2017 ******** 
18/10/1987 ********** (Thursday) 08/05/2018 ** 
23/11/1988 **** 10/06/2019 *** 
27/12/1989 ***** 14/07/2020 *** 
28/01/1991 *** 19/08/2021 ** 
28/02/1992 ** 26/09/2022 ***** 
30/03/1993 *** 02/11/2023 ******* 
30/04/1994 *** 07/12/2024 **** 
01/06/1995 *** 09/01/2026 *** 
04/07/1996 ******* 10/02/2027 **** 
09/08/1997 **** 12/03/2028 ** 
16/09/1998 * 12/04/2029 **** 
23/10/1999 * 13/05/2030 ** 
  14/06/2031 ***** 
  19/07/2032 **** 
  24/08/2033 ** 
  01/10/2034 *** 
  07/11/2035 ****** 



l</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sun-Jupiter Opposition Dates 1970-2035<br />
(Note: The severity rating was calculated using some basic zodiacal rules.<br />
For more details regarding this, click here.) </p>
<p>The markets generally drop noticeably in the 10 days leading into the dates given below.<br />
If they haven&#8217;t yet dropped by this date, they often drop exactly on the date or or the day after.<br />
Consider Selling the markets short up to 10 days before these dates.<br />
(The 19 October 1987 crash and several others have begun on a Sun-Jupiter opposition) </p>
<p>Date (d/m/y) Severity Rating Date (d/m/y) Severity Rating </p>
<p>21/04/1970 ****** 28/11/2000 ****<br />
23/05/1971 ****** 01/01/2002 *******<br />
24/06/1972 ******* 02/02/2003 *****<br />
26/07/1973 *** 03/03/2004 *****<br />
05/09/1974 *** 04/04/2005 ******<br />
13/10/1975 ***** 04/05/2006 ***<br />
18/11/1976 *** 05/06/2007 ****<br />
22/12/1977 ***** 09/07/2008 *******<br />
24/01/1979 *** 14/08/2009 ********** (Friday)<br />
24/02/1980 ***** 18/09/2010 ***<br />
26/03/1981 *** 28/10/2011 ******** (Friday)<br />
25/04/1982 *** 02/12/2012 **<br />
27/05/1983 **** 08/01/2014 ***<br />
29/06/1984 **** 06/02/2015 *****<br />
04/08/1985 ** 08/03/2016 ****<br />
10/09/1986 **** 07/04/2017 ********<br />
18/10/1987 ********** (Thursday) 08/05/2018 **<br />
23/11/1988 **** 10/06/2019 ***<br />
27/12/1989 ***** 14/07/2020 ***<br />
28/01/1991 *** 19/08/2021 **<br />
28/02/1992 ** 26/09/2022 *****<br />
30/03/1993 *** 02/11/2023 *******<br />
30/04/1994 *** 07/12/2024 ****<br />
01/06/1995 *** 09/01/2026 ***<br />
04/07/1996 ******* 10/02/2027 ****<br />
09/08/1997 **** 12/03/2028 **<br />
16/09/1998 * 12/04/2029 ****<br />
23/10/1999 * 13/05/2030 **<br />
  14/06/2031 *****<br />
  19/07/2032 ****<br />
  24/08/2033 **<br />
  01/10/2034 ***<br />
  07/11/2035 ****** </p>
<p>l</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-131015</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-131015</guid>
		<description>Although I would agree that the stock market doesn&#039;t move in lock step with economic trends.  And I would agree that a good (or lucky) stock picker can make money in a bear market.  Look at Potash - who would&#039;ve thought it&#039;d be Canada&#039;s 3rd biggest corporation by market cap?

But I would equate stock picking in a market where the broader economic forces are pointing to a steep decline as the financial equivalent to taking a stroll through a minefield.  You could be perfectly OK and find plenty of valuable stuff laying around during your stroll across no-man&#039;s land.  Or you can step on a mine and be completely ripped apart limb from limb in a gigantic explosion.

I just parked my tax return money into an investment savings account earning a few measly percentage points while I wait for continuing bad economic news and poor earnings reports to roll in.  But at least a 3% gain is much better than a 30% loss, which I took on a lot of the stocks which I didn&#039;t bother to sell when things first started to turn south - and still continue to hold onto today, for that matter...  I just don&#039;t think we&#039;ve seen all of the bad economic news yet.  I think there&#039;s a lot more to come.  Like the credit swap defaults in the USA, which I hear is actually an order of magnitude larger than the sub-prime mess in the USA and in that case nobody even knows who owns what either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I would agree that the stock market doesn&#8217;t move in lock step with economic trends.  And I would agree that a good (or lucky) stock picker can make money in a bear market.  Look at Potash &#8211; who would&#8217;ve thought it&#8217;d be Canada&#8217;s 3rd biggest corporation by market cap?</p>
<p>But I would equate stock picking in a market where the broader economic forces are pointing to a steep decline as the financial equivalent to taking a stroll through a minefield.  You could be perfectly OK and find plenty of valuable stuff laying around during your stroll across no-man&#8217;s land.  Or you can step on a mine and be completely ripped apart limb from limb in a gigantic explosion.</p>
<p>I just parked my tax return money into an investment savings account earning a few measly percentage points while I wait for continuing bad economic news and poor earnings reports to roll in.  But at least a 3% gain is much better than a 30% loss, which I took on a lot of the stocks which I didn&#8217;t bother to sell when things first started to turn south &#8211; and still continue to hold onto today, for that matter&#8230;  I just don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ve seen all of the bad economic news yet.  I think there&#8217;s a lot more to come.  Like the credit swap defaults in the USA, which I hear is actually an order of magnitude larger than the sub-prime mess in the USA and in that case nobody even knows who owns what either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-130953</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-130953</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll ditto Jordan about the comment emailer thingy.  We use one called &quot;subscribe to comments&quot;.

I would extend this argument to any economic forecasting including interest rate predictions...

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll ditto Jordan about the comment emailer thingy.  We use one called &#8220;subscribe to comments&#8221;.</p>
<p>I would extend this argument to any economic forecasting including interest rate predictions&#8230;</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-130926</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-130926</guid>
		<description>CC, you used the word diversified.  It&#039;s the best word when discussing investing, but to seldom used.  There are so many &#039;advisers&#039; out there that encourage people to focus on one investment, usually the latest fad (ie ABCP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC, you used the word diversified.  It&#8217;s the best word when discussing investing, but to seldom used.  There are so many &#8216;advisers&#8217; out there that encourage people to focus on one investment, usually the latest fad (ie ABCP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-130919</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-130919</guid>
		<description>Jordon: I personally invest regularly and a bit more than usual at times when stocks are falling sharply. It&#039;s very hard to see money you&#039;ve just invested going down but that&#039;s the reality of the stock market. Mr. Buffett himself pays no attention to his own short-term forecasts for the stock market. Answering that same question he notes &quot;Now, I don&#039;t invest a dime based on macro forecasts&quot;. 

I&#039;ll look into adding comment notification by email.

MikeH: I think if we are careful to avoid overpaying for any asset class by simply not putting new money in when valuations are not reasonable, we are likely to do okay.

Michael: Like Brad notes, long-term stock market predictions that are vaguely right can be attempted. Bogle (Buffett himself used a similar method in a Fortune article in 1999) estimates long-term equity returns based on initial dividend yield, earnings growth rate and change in valuation. Of course, the last variable is impossible to predict because who knows what multiples investors will be willing to pay 10 or 20 years in the future.

Regarding individual stocks, I think there are talented stock pickers out there. It just takes too much time, effort and rationality for me to be one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordon: I personally invest regularly and a bit more than usual at times when stocks are falling sharply. It&#8217;s very hard to see money you&#8217;ve just invested going down but that&#8217;s the reality of the stock market. Mr. Buffett himself pays no attention to his own short-term forecasts for the stock market. Answering that same question he notes &#8220;Now, I don&#8217;t invest a dime based on macro forecasts&#8221;. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll look into adding comment notification by email.</p>
<p>MikeH: I think if we are careful to avoid overpaying for any asset class by simply not putting new money in when valuations are not reasonable, we are likely to do okay.</p>
<p>Michael: Like Brad notes, long-term stock market predictions that are vaguely right can be attempted. Bogle (Buffett himself used a similar method in a Fortune article in 1999) estimates long-term equity returns based on initial dividend yield, earnings growth rate and change in valuation. Of course, the last variable is impossible to predict because who knows what multiples investors will be willing to pay 10 or 20 years in the future.</p>
<p>Regarding individual stocks, I think there are talented stock pickers out there. It just takes too much time, effort and rationality for me to be one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-130909</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-130909</guid>
		<description>CC: I agree with you that short-term predictions of the broad stock market are useless.  Short-term predictions for particular stocks are also probably useless without inside information.

I haven&#039;t figured out how to do long-term predictions for either the general market or individual stocks, but I haven&#039;t rule out the possibility that some people can do it.  If Buffett were challenged to name 10 small cap stocks that will significantly outperform the market, I bet he could get 7 or 8 of them right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC: I agree with you that short-term predictions of the broad stock market are useless.  Short-term predictions for particular stocks are also probably useless without inside information.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t figured out how to do long-term predictions for either the general market or individual stocks, but I haven&#8217;t rule out the possibility that some people can do it.  If Buffett were challenged to name 10 small cap stocks that will significantly outperform the market, I bet he could get 7 or 8 of them right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-130866</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-130866</guid>
		<description>As someone who works in the field of climate change, I&#039;m struck by the parallels here: the stock market seems to be like &quot;weather&quot; and the economy is more like &quot;climate.&quot; You can predict trends in the economy with greater confidence than you can predict short-term changes in the stock market, just as you can predict trends in climate over 100 years with more confidence than you can predict the weather next week. Climate is relatively stable (but can change over time), whereas weather is highly volatile.

In predicting future climate, climatologists use scenarios, which are based on assumptions about greenhouse gas emissions, solar activity, natural cycles, etc., and predictions of future climate are always scenario-dependent. Predicting weather is a completely different process, and accuracy declines rapidly the further out you make your predictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who works in the field of climate change, I&#8217;m struck by the parallels here: the stock market seems to be like &#8220;weather&#8221; and the economy is more like &#8220;climate.&#8221; You can predict trends in the economy with greater confidence than you can predict short-term changes in the stock market, just as you can predict trends in climate over 100 years with more confidence than you can predict the weather next week. Climate is relatively stable (but can change over time), whereas weather is highly volatile.</p>
<p>In predicting future climate, climatologists use scenarios, which are based on assumptions about greenhouse gas emissions, solar activity, natural cycles, etc., and predictions of future climate are always scenario-dependent. Predicting weather is a completely different process, and accuracy declines rapidly the further out you make your predictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeH</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/why-stock-market-predictions-are-useless/#comment-130844</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=936#comment-130844</guid>
		<description>Jordan,

If you invest in a well-balanced basket of low cost Index funds, conventional wisdom holds that over the long run - there is NO bad time to buy. :-) 

Having said that, I personally wait for those 200+ point plunge days to buy more (index funds) to &quot;backfill&quot; my position.

I know it amounts to &quot;timed dollar cost averaging&quot; and carries the risk of opportunity lost if the index shoots up, but as long as you start with a diversified basket, I think the risk/reward trade-off is acceptable.

PS: The reverse does not hold - I do NOT sell on 200+ increases in the index.  I buy and hold for the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan,</p>
<p>If you invest in a well-balanced basket of low cost Index funds, conventional wisdom holds that over the long run &#8211; there is NO bad time to buy. <img src='http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Having said that, I personally wait for those 200+ point plunge days to buy more (index funds) to &#8220;backfill&#8221; my position.</p>
<p>I know it amounts to &#8220;timed dollar cost averaging&#8221; and carries the risk of opportunity lost if the index shoots up, but as long as you start with a diversified basket, I think the risk/reward trade-off is acceptable.</p>
<p>PS: The reverse does not hold &#8211; I do NOT sell on 200+ increases in the index.  I buy and hold for the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

