<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This and That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/#comment-138060</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=968#comment-138060</guid>
		<description>Michael: I agree. Movies liked Maxed Out seem to bear out your contention that institutional changes are to blame for the sad state of thrift among the majority of the population.

CMT: The good news is that bonds might become interesting when the yield is between 4% and 5%.

Phil: It is amazing to see the move in the bond markets subsequent to the bank&#039;s move. In a mere week, bond yields have gone up more than 50 basis points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: I agree. Movies liked Maxed Out seem to bear out your contention that institutional changes are to blame for the sad state of thrift among the majority of the population.</p>
<p>CMT: The good news is that bonds might become interesting when the yield is between 4% and 5%.</p>
<p>Phil: It is amazing to see the move in the bond markets subsequent to the bank&#8217;s move. In a mere week, bond yields have gone up more than 50 basis points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/#comment-137965</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 03:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=968#comment-137965</guid>
		<description>Actually, I rather thought to myself that interest rates should be going UP to stave off inflation, not down like the Bay Street prognosticators were calling for...  So, standing pat is the next best thing.

Just one man&#039;s opinion, but I think a 3% BoC rate is plenty of stimulus for the economy - someone who is willing to borrow money at 2.75% interest rate to invest should be able to make money at 3%, so in terms of economic stimulus, I don&#039;t see much difference between 2.75% and 3%.  In fact, I think a 4% rate is also stimulative for the economy - most businesses should be able to make a lot more on profit margin than a 4% interest rate would eat up.  The big problem is obviously that now the big 5 banks are gun-shy.  They won&#039;t be lending out money to any Tom, Dick and Harry anymore - so no matter what the BoC does, the banks which are the conduit for that money may be stoppered.  As a result, those precious few basis points would have more of an effect on inflation than on the economy.

That said, I think the US recession is going to eventually spill across the border to Canada anyways.  Lowering interest rates may delay the recession, but I think a Canadian recession will be inevitable...  I think we might as well defend the currency so that our purchasing power doesn&#039;t get obliterated like I think the savings of US retirees will be by the inflation monster...  In other words, we shouldn&#039;t try to follow the US economy down the path that they have chosen...  It looks very dark and creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I rather thought to myself that interest rates should be going UP to stave off inflation, not down like the Bay Street prognosticators were calling for&#8230;  So, standing pat is the next best thing.</p>
<p>Just one man&#8217;s opinion, but I think a 3% BoC rate is plenty of stimulus for the economy &#8211; someone who is willing to borrow money at 2.75% interest rate to invest should be able to make money at 3%, so in terms of economic stimulus, I don&#8217;t see much difference between 2.75% and 3%.  In fact, I think a 4% rate is also stimulative for the economy &#8211; most businesses should be able to make a lot more on profit margin than a 4% interest rate would eat up.  The big problem is obviously that now the big 5 banks are gun-shy.  They won&#8217;t be lending out money to any Tom, Dick and Harry anymore &#8211; so no matter what the BoC does, the banks which are the conduit for that money may be stoppered.  As a result, those precious few basis points would have more of an effect on inflation than on the economy.</p>
<p>That said, I think the US recession is going to eventually spill across the border to Canada anyways.  Lowering interest rates may delay the recession, but I think a Canadian recession will be inevitable&#8230;  I think we might as well defend the currency so that our purchasing power doesn&#8217;t get obliterated like I think the savings of US retirees will be by the inflation monster&#8230;  In other words, we shouldn&#8217;t try to follow the US economy down the path that they have chosen&#8230;  It looks very dark and creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Mortgage</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/#comment-137954</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Mortgage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=968#comment-137954</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention CC!

It&#039;s interesting how much bond yields ramped up after the BoC&#039;s announcement.  12 of 12 primary securities dealers got the call wrong.  These are people with more money and information than they know what to do with.  

It really is humbling, and it shows how little any of us can ever really know about the direction of interest rates (even short-term!).

Have a great weekend,
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention CC!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting how much bond yields ramped up after the BoC&#8217;s announcement.  12 of 12 primary securities dealers got the call wrong.  These are people with more money and information than they know what to do with.  </p>
<p>It really is humbling, and it shows how little any of us can ever really know about the direction of interest rates (even short-term!).</p>
<p>Have a great weekend,<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/#comment-137857</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=968#comment-137857</guid>
		<description>I liked the two articles about debt in America.  However, I found Barbara Whitehead&#039;s contention that the problem comes mainly from regulatory structures and business practices much more plausible than David Brooks&#039; idea that it is mainly a morality problem.  It seems apparent to me that the debt industry has changed much more than personal weaknesses have changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the two articles about debt in America.  However, I found Barbara Whitehead&#8217;s contention that the problem comes mainly from regulatory structures and business practices much more plausible than David Brooks&#8217; idea that it is mainly a morality problem.  It seems apparent to me that the debt industry has changed much more than personal weaknesses have changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/#comment-137810</link>
		<dc:creator>Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=968#comment-137810</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention CC, enjoy the weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention CC, enjoy the weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/#comment-137789</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=968#comment-137789</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been quite a while since I investigated the Claymore funds, but I was scared off by the cash flow statements on the funds of their in which I was interested.  The funds I looked into seemed to be overdistributing and it wasn&#039;t completely clear and concise what was going on with the management fees - the math didn&#039;t seem to work out right.  You should take a close look at their prospectus and cash flow statements before you invest in their funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been quite a while since I investigated the Claymore funds, but I was scared off by the cash flow statements on the funds of their in which I was interested.  The funds I looked into seemed to be overdistributing and it wasn&#8217;t completely clear and concise what was going on with the management fees &#8211; the math didn&#8217;t seem to work out right.  You should take a close look at their prospectus and cash flow statements before you invest in their funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-94/#comment-137762</link>
		<dc:creator>WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=968#comment-137762</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link - have a great weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link &#8211; have a great weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

