<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This and That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nurseb911</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128728</link>
		<dc:creator>Nurseb911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128728</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention also CC!!!! (Added you to the Blogroll)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention also CC!!!! (Added you to the Blogroll)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128703</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128703</guid>
		<description>Hamcake: Let&#039;s say you received Microsoft Office software at deep discount through your employer. The software retails for $600 but you were allowed to purchase it for $50. I believe the $550 benefit is non-taxable. i.e. it is not treated as employment income and you don&#039;t have to declare it on your taxes. 

The non-taxable benefits I&#039;ve personally received were already offered by the employer. I don&#039;t know how to actually set it up, so other readers might have more comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hamcake: Let&#8217;s say you received Microsoft Office software at deep discount through your employer. The software retails for $600 but you were allowed to purchase it for $50. I believe the $550 benefit is non-taxable. i.e. it is not treated as employment income and you don&#8217;t have to declare it on your taxes. </p>
<p>The non-taxable benefits I&#8217;ve personally received were already offered by the employer. I don&#8217;t know how to actually set it up, so other readers might have more comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Danza</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128699</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Danza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128699</guid>
		<description>After reading the articles featuring Prem Watsa and Warren Buffett I&#039;d say Mr. Watsa seems to have little in common with Buffett. Buffett&#039;s whole mantra is admitting you&#039;re not smart enough to time the market yet that is exactly what Watsa is attempting based on macro data.

Thanks for the articles and links CC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the articles featuring Prem Watsa and Warren Buffett I&#8217;d say Mr. Watsa seems to have little in common with Buffett. Buffett&#8217;s whole mantra is admitting you&#8217;re not smart enough to time the market yet that is exactly what Watsa is attempting based on macro data.</p>
<p>Thanks for the articles and links CC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamcake</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128655</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamcake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128655</guid>
		<description>About article 6: I often hear about non-taxable benefits, but have never found a definitive source on the subject. 
How are these handled at tax-time?
If an employer doesn&#039;t provide a group benefits plan, could they instead pay for your glasses/prescription/dental themselves? How would you set that up with them so that it&#039;s not treated as additional income (and taxed)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About article 6: I often hear about non-taxable benefits, but have never found a definitive source on the subject.<br />
How are these handled at tax-time?<br />
If an employer doesn&#8217;t provide a group benefits plan, could they instead pay for your glasses/prescription/dental themselves? How would you set that up with them so that it&#8217;s not treated as additional income (and taxed)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128644</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128644</guid>
		<description>oxCC: I think spousal RRSPs still make sense for folks aiming for an early retirement but the introduction of pension income splitting did take a lot away from the benefits of spousal RRSPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oxCC: I think spousal RRSPs still make sense for folks aiming for an early retirement but the introduction of pension income splitting did take a lot away from the benefits of spousal RRSPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0xCC</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128626</link>
		<dc:creator>0xCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128626</guid>
		<description>The Tim Cestnick article is interesting.  One of the points he brings up is income splitting to reduce taxes.  He uses the example of paying family members for working in a business but he also touches on spousal RRSPs.  I&#039;m wondering, now that we have pensions income splitting (which I think includes RRIFs) do spousal RRSPs make any sense anymore?  I suppose if you were using the spousal RRSP to withdraw from before retirement and you did the necessary steps to avoid the attribution rules then they could make sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tim Cestnick article is interesting.  One of the points he brings up is income splitting to reduce taxes.  He uses the example of paying family members for working in a business but he also touches on spousal RRSPs.  I&#8217;m wondering, now that we have pensions income splitting (which I think includes RRIFs) do spousal RRSPs make any sense anymore?  I suppose if you were using the spousal RRSP to withdraw from before retirement and you did the necessary steps to avoid the attribution rules then they could make sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Cajun Man</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128618</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Cajun Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128618</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, I still have my snow tires on though... next week they come off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, I still have my snow tires on though&#8230; next week they come off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squawkfox</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128613</link>
		<dc:creator>squawkfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128613</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for mentioning my career series! Many people have downloaded the series templates and worksheets throughout the week. Have an awesome weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for mentioning my career series! Many people have downloaded the series templates and worksheets throughout the week. Have an awesome weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128612</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128612</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention!

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention!</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-86/#comment-128609</link>
		<dc:creator>Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=926#comment-128609</guid>
		<description>As always, honored to be mentioned.  Enjoy the weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, honored to be mentioned.  Enjoy the weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

