<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This and That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-46/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-46/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-46/#comment-37205</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 12:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/05/17/this-and-that-46#comment-37205</guid>
		<description>Labour Sponsored Investment Funds can be thought of as Private Equity funds as one of the purposes of their existence is to invest in private companies.  It&#039;s unfortunate that in the past history of this class of investment, the investment managers all come from the mutual fund world and have no idea what the heck they&#039;re doing when they step into the private equity or venture capital world.  This class of investment could be so much more if it were run by private equity players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour Sponsored Investment Funds can be thought of as Private Equity funds as one of the purposes of their existence is to invest in private companies.  It&#8217;s unfortunate that in the past history of this class of investment, the investment managers all come from the mutual fund world and have no idea what the heck they&#8217;re doing when they step into the private equity or venture capital world.  This class of investment could be so much more if it were run by private equity players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-46/#comment-37015</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/05/17/this-and-that-46#comment-37015</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link CC, much appreciated.

FT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link CC, much appreciated.</p>
<p>FT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-46/#comment-36891</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 11:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/05/17/this-and-that-46#comment-36891</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been following the Easy Chair series.  They are certainly spreading out the series quite a bit.

8.7% is good but it would be nice if they could compare with indexes for return and volatility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following the Easy Chair series.  They are certainly spreading out the series quite a bit.</p>
<p>8.7% is good but it would be nice if they could compare with indexes for return and volatility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

