<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This and That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-45/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-45/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-45/#comment-35721</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/05/10/this-and-that-45#comment-35721</guid>
		<description>FT: Everyone (even the most aggressive investor) should have some bonds in their portfolio. In my personal portfolios, I am shooting for 20% allocation and am currently at 15% and I consider myself an aggressive investor.

Having your age in bonds is a good thumb rule, but it also depends on other factors like your time horizon, risk tolerance etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FT: Everyone (even the most aggressive investor) should have some bonds in their portfolio. In my personal portfolios, I am shooting for 20% allocation and am currently at 15% and I consider myself an aggressive investor.</p>
<p>Having your age in bonds is a good thumb rule, but it also depends on other factors like your time horizon, risk tolerance etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MillionDollarJourney.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-45/#comment-35684</link>
		<dc:creator>MillionDollarJourney.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/05/10/this-and-that-45#comment-35684</guid>
		<description>CC, what is your opinion on the % of bond allocation to ones portfolio?  Do you follow the age rule where the older you get, the higher the % of bonds you should hold?

FT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC, what is your opinion on the % of bond allocation to ones portfolio?  Do you follow the age rule where the older you get, the higher the % of bonds you should hold?</p>
<p>FT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-45/#comment-34843</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/05/10/this-and-that-45#comment-34843</guid>
		<description>Good point. However, I noted that the funds are low-cost compared to other Canadian mutual funds. Yes, Canadian mutual fund fees are very high compared to the rest of the world, but what can the average investor do about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. However, I noted that the funds are low-cost compared to other Canadian mutual funds. Yes, Canadian mutual fund fees are very high compared to the rest of the world, but what can the average investor do about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outroupistache</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-45/#comment-34801</link>
		<dc:creator>Outroupistache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 03:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/05/10/this-and-that-45#comment-34801</guid>
		<description>CC, I know you are aware of the difference but using the term &quot;low cost&quot; in reference to any Canadian fund gives too much credit to our domestic fund industry. Another of your posts refers to a study that concludes the Canadian fund industry has the highest fees in the world. Even the lowest cost of our Canadian funds are  not close to those of our nearest neighbour, the USA, nor the UK. 

Take bond funds, for example. The iShares UK bond ETF index funds are mostly 0.20% annual MER, the US iShares range between 0.15 and 0.20% while the good old Canadian iShares clock in at 0.25% to 0.40%. Canadian costs are double those in the US. That&#039;s the same company!! TD&#039;s e-Series bond index fund has 0.48% MER while Vanguard&#039;s US bond ETF funds have expense ratios of 0.18 to 0.20% and the absolute highest of any of their many mutual funds is 0.29% with the majority in the 0.14-020% range. Canada has a long ways to go before I would use the term low cost in the same sentence with the word fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC, I know you are aware of the difference but using the term &#8220;low cost&#8221; in reference to any Canadian fund gives too much credit to our domestic fund industry. Another of your posts refers to a study that concludes the Canadian fund industry has the highest fees in the world. Even the lowest cost of our Canadian funds are  not close to those of our nearest neighbour, the USA, nor the UK. </p>
<p>Take bond funds, for example. The iShares UK bond ETF index funds are mostly 0.20% annual MER, the US iShares range between 0.15 and 0.20% while the good old Canadian iShares clock in at 0.25% to 0.40%. Canadian costs are double those in the US. That&#8217;s the same company!! TD&#8217;s e-Series bond index fund has 0.48% MER while Vanguard&#8217;s US bond ETF funds have expense ratios of 0.18 to 0.20% and the absolute highest of any of their many mutual funds is 0.29% with the majority in the 0.14-020% range. Canada has a long ways to go before I would use the term low cost in the same sentence with the word fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

