<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This and That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-29111</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-29111</guid>
		<description>I just took a look at the Claymore ETFs and most of them are so new that they haven&#039;t even published their first quarterly report yet!  You only have the prospectus to go on.  I like the concept behind a few of them, but I&#039;m not willing to put my cash into them until I see what their quarterly report with cash flow statements looks like and a complete list of their holdings...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just took a look at the Claymore ETFs and most of them are so new that they haven&#8217;t even published their first quarterly report yet!  You only have the prospectus to go on.  I like the concept behind a few of them, but I&#8217;m not willing to put my cash into them until I see what their quarterly report with cash flow statements looks like and a complete list of their holdings&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-28793</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-28793</guid>
		<description>I have used Quicktax and Taxwiz in the past. This year I used StudioTax. It works great, and it is free. It did everything I needed, including Netfile. All they ask for is a donation. The link is included.

Cheers

http://www.studiotax.com/en/main.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Quicktax and Taxwiz in the past. This year I used StudioTax. It works great, and it is free. It did everything I needed, including Netfile. All they ask for is a donation. The link is included.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p><a href="http://www.studiotax.com/en/main.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.studiotax.com/en/main.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleks</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-28761</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-28761</guid>
		<description>We made the switch from Quicktax to UFile this year.  There&#039;s really nothing in Quicktax that justifies paying more than $20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We made the switch from Quicktax to UFile this year.  There&#8217;s really nothing in Quicktax that justifies paying more than $20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-28727</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-28727</guid>
		<description>CC I saw your comments in Chevreau&#039;s blog - pretty good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC I saw your comments in Chevreau&#8217;s blog &#8211; pretty good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-28658</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-28658</guid>
		<description>Luc: I regret the error. Here it is:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intuit.ca/en/taxwiz/index.jsp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luc: I regret the error. Here it is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.intuit.ca/en/taxwiz/index.jsp" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Dream</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-28655</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Dream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-28655</guid>
		<description>CC,

Thanks for the link.  It really is a debate that just will not die.

I suppose that is a good thing to try and generate a new idea once in a while on it.

CD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC,</p>
<p>Thanks for the link.  It really is a debate that just will not die.</p>
<p>I suppose that is a good thing to try and generate a new idea once in a while on it.</p>
<p>CD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-28632</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-28632</guid>
		<description>I just finished the &#039;Four Pillars&#039; a couple of days ago and also plan to buy it.  

The author maintains a website http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/index.shtml which contains occasional finance articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished the &#8216;Four Pillars&#8217; a couple of days ago and also plan to buy it.  </p>
<p>The author maintains a website <a href="http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/index.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/index.shtml</a> which contains occasional finance articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-28610</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-28610</guid>
		<description>The link to QUickTax shows an empty cart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to QUickTax shows an empty cart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malkiel, Bogle Argue Against Non-Market Capitalization Weighted ETFs at Investing Intelligently</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-41/#comment-28585</link>
		<dc:creator>Malkiel, Bogle Argue Against Non-Market Capitalization Weighted ETFs at Investing Intelligently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 05:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/04/13/this-and-that-41#comment-28585</guid>
		<description>[...] found this little nugget from June 2006 from a link I saw (not a very interesting read) on Canadian Capitalist&#8217;s blog. It&#8217;s an article called &#8220;Turn on a Paradigm?&#8221; (very interesting read) and it was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found this little nugget from June 2006 from a link I saw (not a very interesting read) on Canadian Capitalist&#8217;s blog. It&#8217;s an article called &#8220;Turn on a Paradigm?&#8221; (very interesting read) and it was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

