<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This and That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=344#comment-833</guid>
		<description>lecentre: The column was published soon after the election and there was a some talk then that Parliament might start sitting at an early date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lecentre: The column was published soon after the election and there was a some talk then that Parliament might start sitting at an early date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lecentre</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>lecentre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=344#comment-822</guid>
		<description>Last I checked, the &lt;b&gt; budget is presented as a bill, to Parliament. Parliament returning April 3, &lt;/b&gt;it is surprising the Globe can say it will be presented in March.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I checked, the <b> budget is presented as a bill, to Parliament. Parliament returning April 3, </b>it is surprising the Globe can say it will be presented in March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0xcc</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>0xcc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=344#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Actually that $1040 was from the federal tax portion of my paycheque deductions.  The EI premiums are outside of that (and the CPP increase took a little of that back).  So I guess a part of the reduction in federal tax was due to the inflation adjustments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually that $1040 was from the federal tax portion of my paycheque deductions.  The EI premiums are outside of that (and the CPP increase took a little of that back).  So I guess a part of the reduction in federal tax was due to the inflation adjustments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=344#comment-604</guid>
		<description>HI: I think it is a fairly sure bet that the income tax cut will be eliminated. The GST cut is in the &quot;5 things I will do&quot; promise and the feds can&#039;t pay for both tax cuts. So one way or other, the 16% bracket is coming back :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI: I think it is a fairly sure bet that the income tax cut will be eliminated. The GST cut is in the &#8220;5 things I will do&#8221; promise and the feds can&#8217;t pay for both tax cuts. So one way or other, the 16% bracket is coming back <img src='http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=344#comment-600</guid>
		<description>0xcc: Your $1040 per year less in taxes is not entirely due to the fiscal update tax cut. EI premiums are a bit lower and all brackets and basic personal amounts are higher (indexed to inflation). I think almost everyone earning over $35,000 would get a fiscal update tax cut of $300-$350. So, we need to spend between $30,000-$35,000 in GST-applicable spending to get the same benefit.

I think in rough dollar terms both tax cuts would mean the same to most Canadians. But, I believe that it is better to tax spending and cut taxes on income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0xcc: Your $1040 per year less in taxes is not entirely due to the fiscal update tax cut. EI premiums are a bit lower and all brackets and basic personal amounts are higher (indexed to inflation). I think almost everyone earning over $35,000 would get a fiscal update tax cut of $300-$350. So, we need to spend between $30,000-$35,000 in GST-applicable spending to get the same benefit.</p>
<p>I think in rough dollar terms both tax cuts would mean the same to most Canadians. But, I believe that it is better to tax spending and cut taxes on income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humble Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Humble Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=344#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Unless the Conservatives try and eliminate the tax cuts of last year through an order in council (i.e. outside the legislature) I suspect they will have a very difficult time in having this passed. What other party would go on record to have propped up a minority government in effectively increasing taxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless the Conservatives try and eliminate the tax cuts of last year through an order in council (i.e. outside the legislature) I suspect they will have a very difficult time in having this passed. What other party would go on record to have propped up a minority government in effectively increasing taxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0xcc</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/this-and-that-13/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>0xcc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=344#comment-598</guid>
		<description>The federal budget stuff should be interesting.  I don&#039;t want to see those income tax cuts that started in 2006 go away (for me it made less than a $40 difference in my biweekly pay) but I wonder if that would be offset by the GST cut.  I guess $40x26=1040 and 1040/1%=$104,000 so I would have to spend $104k on GST-laden goods and services to make up for it.  Well, I think I would be stretching it if I said I spend a quarter of that so I would rather have the income tax cuts. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal budget stuff should be interesting.  I don&#8217;t want to see those income tax cuts that started in 2006 go away (for me it made less than a $40 difference in my biweekly pay) but I wonder if that would be offset by the GST cut.  I guess $40&#215;26=1040 and 1040/1%=$104,000 so I would have to spend $104k on GST-laden goods and services to make up for it.  Well, I think I would be stretching it if I said I spend a quarter of that so I would rather have the income tax cuts. <img src='http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

