<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech Value?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/tech-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/tech-value/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Cajun Man</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/tech-value/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Cajun Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=115#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be fooled, High Tech comebacks have been predicted for many years, and I agree, the only way I will be participating in this new &quot;boom&quot; (you know like a bomb makes) will be via options and bonuses (I really hope).&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;c8j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be fooled, High Tech comebacks have been predicted for many years, and I agree, the only way I will be participating in this new &#8220;boom&#8221; (you know like a bomb makes) will be via options and bonuses (I really hope).</p>
<p>c8j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/tech-value/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=115#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I agree. But tech is a valid investment for some people. For a random example look at Yahoo&#039;s numbers:&lt;BR/&gt;FY2002: 953m&lt;BR/&gt;FY2003: 1625m&lt;BR/&gt;FY2004: 3574m&lt;BR/&gt;Very few areas of economy where you can get that kind of growth (and busts that compare in scale).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. But tech is a valid investment for some people. For a random example look at Yahoo&#8217;s numbers:<br />FY2002: 953m<br />FY2003: 1625m<br />FY2004: 3574m<br />Very few areas of economy where you can get that kind of growth (and busts that compare in scale).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

