- Comments (10)
- Text Size: Down Up
moneysense.ca, 21/05/12
Tax Treatment of Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) Benefits
If you work for a large company, chances are Employee Stock Option benefits (ESOPs) have been replaced with Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). There are significant differences between tax treatment of ESOPs and RSUs. In this post, we will look at how RSUs are taxed for Canadian residents. Restricted Stock Units are simply a promise to issue stock at some future vesting date(s) provided some condition(s) (often just being an employee of the company on the vesting date) are met. It is important here to distinguish RSUs from Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs). RSAs are stock grants in which employees may not sell or transfer the shares until they vest but are entitled to dividend payments. RSAs are unpopular in Canada due to their tax treatment: the FMV of the the RSA grant is taxed as employment income at grant but employees will receive the cash from the sale after the grants vest, which may be many years later.
Like stock options, there are no tax implications when RSUs are granted to an employee. At the time of vesting, the FMV of the RSU grants that vested is considered as employment income. Starting in 2011, the Canada Revenue Agency requires employers to withhold taxes on employee stock benefits, including RSUs. Therefore, your employer will likely sell a portion of vested restricted stock and remit it to the CRA. The FMV of restricted stock and taxes withheld will be added to the Employment Income (Line 101) and Income Tax Deducted (Line 437) of the T4 slip for the financial year.
The employee has to keep track of restricted stock FMV at the time of vesting. If there are multiple vesting events, the adjusted cost base of the stock must be calculated. When the stocks are eventually sold, the difference between the proceeds of the sale and the adjusted cost base of the shares should be reported in Schedule 3 Capital Gains (or Losses).
Let’s take an example. Sue works for ABC Corp. and was awarded 300 RSUs on May 1, 2011. ⅙th of the award will vest every 6 months provided Sue is employed on the vesting date. Sue’s first batch of 50 units of restricted stock vested on November 1, 2011. ABC was trading at $10 and Sue’s employer sold 23 shares and remitted the withholding tax to CRA. Sue’s second batch of 50 units of restricted stock vested on May 1, 2012. ABC was trading at $12 and Sue’s employer again sold 23 shares and remitted the withholding tax to CRA. In both cases, her employer included $500 and $600 in employment income and $230 and $276 in income tax deducted in Sue’s T4 for 2011 and 2012 respectively. Note that, unlike stock options which are eligible for the stock option deduction and hence are taxed at 50 percent, there is no favourable tax treatment accorded to RSUs.
On May 15, 2012, ABC hit $15 and Sue sold the 54 shares of ABC Corp. that she holds. Sue’s adjusted cost base is $11 (27 shares acquired at $10 and 27 shares acquired at $12). Since she sold for $15, her capital gains are $216, which she would declare when filing her 2012 tax return in Schedule 3.
moneysense.ca, 21/05/12









Thanks for the timely post. My first round of RSUs vest this week.
Based on your example where 23% of RSUs are sold to pay taxes, I assume that only half the employment income from RSUs gets added to income (similar to stock options). Is that right?
@Michael: Good point. There is no stock option deduction available for RSUs. Therefore, the entire FMV of the vested shares are added to employment income and there is no offsetting stock option deduction.
“Let’s take an example. Sue works for ABC Corp. and was awarded 600 RSUs on May 1, 2011. ⅙th of the award will vest every 6 months provided Sue is employed on the vesting date. Sue’s first batch of 50 units of restricted stock vested on November 1, 2011. ”
Seems like something is wrong here. 1/6 of 600 is not 50.
My company has been selling 23% of my RSUs to cover taxes for many years now (my marginal tax rate is 46%), has issued my T4s to that effect, and has assured me that this is the correct tax treatment of RSUs. Do you think they are incorrect?
@Greg: Oops. Of course, it should be 300 units so that 1/6th of 300 is 50.
It’s only starting in 2011 that CRA *requires* employers to withhold tax on employee stock benefits. Prior to that most employers did not withhold tax on stock benefits. Since it appears that your employer withheld and remitted tax even earlier, there is no issue here. Your employer is doing the correct thing.
See this CRA page for more information:
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/gncy/bdgt/2010/mplystckptns-eng.html
Ok, yes, $300 makes sense. But now your example is consistent with your comment above that RSU FMV is fully is taxed as income. My employer only sells to cover 50% of the taxes that would be due on income, the same as stock options. They tell me that their tax consultants indicate that the tax rates on RSUs and stock opions are the same but I have never been able to directly confirm this.
@Greg: I’m by no means a tax expert, so I may be mistaken on this. My understanding is that since RSUs are typically granted with a strike price of $0 (which is less than the FMV of the stock at the time the grant was awarded), the stock option deduction is not available.
If my employer issues the RSUs at vesting date as share certificates, can I transfer them at the FMV (deemed by the company) to my spouse?
If a company were to issue RSU’s to their staff, but they did not want to dilute the market, would they buyback the shares from the open market when the RSU’s are granted? or when they vest?
Thanks Greg for the post. What happens if a U.S. based public company issues RSUs to a Canadian employee?