<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock Market Weightings excluding Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Race</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-286401</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Race</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-286401</guid>
		<description>The US rally in September will hopefully spark some increased consumer confidence.  I still think the &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewjohns.ca/why_invest_in_canada&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Canadian Stock Market&lt;/a&gt; is a great alternative, especially while the US dollar is on shaky ground. I think Canadian commodities are a good place to start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US rally in September will hopefully spark some increased consumer confidence.  I still think the <a href="http://andrewjohns.ca/why_invest_in_canada" rel="nofollow">Canadian Stock Market</a> is a great alternative, especially while the US dollar is on shaky ground. I think Canadian commodities are a good place to start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Variable Rate (Prime-0.60%) Mortgage for MDJ Readers and Links &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214917</link>
		<dc:creator>Variable Rate (Prime-0.60%) Mortgage for MDJ Readers and Links &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214917</guid>
		<description>[...] Stock Market Weightings excluding Canada @ Canadian Capitalist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stock Market Weightings excluding Canada @ Canadian Capitalist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214684</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214684</guid>
		<description>I use VT to *directly* guide the allocation of my portfolio.  I use VEA, VWO and a mishmash of stuff for North America to match VT&#039;s allocations.

This approach appeals to me because it feels like I&#039;m following &quot;an index of indexes&quot;.  It keeps me from thinking about allocations in the same way that an index fund keeps me from thinking about individual stocks.  Couch potato squared.

Dan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use VT to *directly* guide the allocation of my portfolio.  I use VEA, VWO and a mishmash of stuff for North America to match VT&#8217;s allocations.</p>
<p>This approach appeals to me because it feels like I&#8217;m following &#8220;an index of indexes&#8221;.  It keeps me from thinking about allocations in the same way that an index fund keeps me from thinking about individual stocks.  Couch potato squared.</p>
<p>Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214673</link>
		<dc:creator>Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214673</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m missing something here CC.

Isn&#039;t it all about alpha and beta? 

The economies (and underlying companies) from different regions are growing or shrinking with respect to one another, but that in itself should have no bearing on your performance.  It will affect your performance compared to that particular index, but as you yourself point out in your response to &quot;E&quot;, over-weighting some regions like your home country has many benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing something here CC.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it all about alpha and beta? </p>
<p>The economies (and underlying companies) from different regions are growing or shrinking with respect to one another, but that in itself should have no bearing on your performance.  It will affect your performance compared to that particular index, but as you yourself point out in your response to &#8220;E&#8221;, over-weighting some regions like your home country has many benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214654</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214654</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your insights on that one CC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insights on that one CC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214617</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214617</guid>
		<description>@DM: VEA and VWO are US-listed stocks that hold foreign stocks. Therefore, the withholding tax between the US and the foreign country that the stocks in the ETF are listed in applies. The ETF pays the withholding tax and this is not recoverable for Canadian investors. When a Canadian resident holds VEA and VWO in a RRSP account, there is no US withholding tax but the US-Foreign withholding tax is already deducted. Vanguard adjusts the index return for withholding taxes but these taxes are a cost for investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DM: VEA and VWO are US-listed stocks that hold foreign stocks. Therefore, the withholding tax between the US and the foreign country that the stocks in the ETF are listed in applies. The ETF pays the withholding tax and this is not recoverable for Canadian investors. When a Canadian resident holds VEA and VWO in a RRSP account, there is no US withholding tax but the US-Foreign withholding tax is already deducted. Vanguard adjusts the index return for withholding taxes but these taxes are a cost for investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DM</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214611</link>
		<dc:creator>DM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214611</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ve covered the issue of withholding taxes before but now you&#039;ve got me wondering.  My foreign equity is comprised of just two securities: VEA and  VWO.  They are both held in my RSP. Am I correct in understanding that distributions from these two ETFs are NOT subject to any withholding tax (as long as they remain in my RSP)?  

I take the easy way out on the issue of diversification.  I allocate the equity portion of my portfolio evenly among Canada, US and Int&#039;l.  I have reduced exposure to EM.

For currency, my IPS states that no more than 40% of my portfolio can be in USD at any one time.  This gets ratcheted down each year, so that by the time I&#039;m 55 (when I plan to retire) a maximum of 10% can be in USD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve covered the issue of withholding taxes before but now you&#8217;ve got me wondering.  My foreign equity is comprised of just two securities: VEA and  VWO.  They are both held in my RSP. Am I correct in understanding that distributions from these two ETFs are NOT subject to any withholding tax (as long as they remain in my RSP)?  </p>
<p>I take the easy way out on the issue of diversification.  I allocate the equity portion of my portfolio evenly among Canada, US and Int&#8217;l.  I have reduced exposure to EM.</p>
<p>For currency, my IPS states that no more than 40% of my portfolio can be in USD at any one time.  This gets ratcheted down each year, so that by the time I&#8217;m 55 (when I plan to retire) a maximum of 10% can be in USD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214599</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214599</guid>
		<description>@E: There are a few really good reasons for Canadian investors being overweight in our local stock market:

1. In today&#039;s globalized economy, the expected returns from Canadian stocks are not likely to be materially different from other developed markets over the long term. Canadian investors who are resident in Canada have future liabilities in Canadian dollars. Therefore, Canadian investors should hold enough foreign stocks to obtain the benefits of diversification but should be wary of taking on too much currency risk. Is a 30-70 Canada-International, the right split? Is it too much or too little? You could argue either way and not reach a consensus. Some argue that given that Canada makes up less than 4% of global markets, a 30% allocation is too much. Others point out that the benefits of diversification can be achieved with a much lower foreign allocation, say a 70-30 split instead. I don&#039;t think there is a right answer here, so I picked an allocation that seemed reasonable to me.

2. Preferential treatment of Canadian dividends: In taxable accounts, depending on your tax bracket, the taxes on eligible dividends might be half that of foreign dividends. Assuming a dividend yield of 2.5%, this translates to a loss of as much as 1.25% per year.

3. Withholding taxes: Foreign stock dividends might be subject to withholding taxes even if held in a RRSP account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@E: There are a few really good reasons for Canadian investors being overweight in our local stock market:</p>
<p>1. In today&#8217;s globalized economy, the expected returns from Canadian stocks are not likely to be materially different from other developed markets over the long term. Canadian investors who are resident in Canada have future liabilities in Canadian dollars. Therefore, Canadian investors should hold enough foreign stocks to obtain the benefits of diversification but should be wary of taking on too much currency risk. Is a 30-70 Canada-International, the right split? Is it too much or too little? You could argue either way and not reach a consensus. Some argue that given that Canada makes up less than 4% of global markets, a 30% allocation is too much. Others point out that the benefits of diversification can be achieved with a much lower foreign allocation, say a 70-30 split instead. I don&#8217;t think there is a right answer here, so I picked an allocation that seemed reasonable to me.</p>
<p>2. Preferential treatment of Canadian dividends: In taxable accounts, depending on your tax bracket, the taxes on eligible dividends might be half that of foreign dividends. Assuming a dividend yield of 2.5%, this translates to a loss of as much as 1.25% per year.</p>
<p>3. Withholding taxes: Foreign stock dividends might be subject to withholding taxes even if held in a RRSP account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214593</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214593</guid>
		<description>Given that info, why would the Sleepy Portfolio have so much weighted in Canada?  3.6% vs. your 20-ish% is causing your portfolio to be heavily balanced in one of the smaller markets out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that info, why would the Sleepy Portfolio have so much weighted in Canada?  3.6% vs. your 20-ish% is causing your portfolio to be heavily balanced in one of the smaller markets out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Stock Market Weightings excluding Canada &#124; Canadian Capitalist -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/stock-market-weightings-excluding-canada/#comment-214566</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Stock Market Weightings excluding Canada &#124; Canadian Capitalist -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3630#comment-214566</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Canadian Capitalist. Canadian Capitalist said: New Blog Post: Stock Market Weightings excluding Canada http://bit.ly/cOTawD [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Canadian Capitalist. Canadian Capitalist said: New Blog Post: Stock Market Weightings excluding Canada <a href="http://bit.ly/cOTawD" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cOTawD</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

