<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steadyhand Mutual Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Poncelet, CFP</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-274847</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Poncelet, CFP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-274847</guid>
		<description>Hey CC,

UPDATE

From what I can see the Canadian Focused fund (net of fees) for August 31/2010 year to date return is -3.73%  vs. TSX Composite 1.43%  (no fees).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey CC,</p>
<p>UPDATE</p>
<p>From what I can see the Canadian Focused fund (net of fees) for August 31/2010 year to date return is -3.73%  vs. TSX Composite 1.43%  (no fees).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steadyhand&#8217;s Innovative Fee Structure &#124; Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-210774</link>
		<dc:creator>Steadyhand&#8217;s Innovative Fee Structure &#124; Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-210774</guid>
		<description>[...] 11th, 2010 &#183; No Comments  For a mutual fund company, Steadyhand takes an unconventional approach by offering low-cost funds, co-investing along with clients, hiring portfolio managers who make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 11th, 2010 &middot; No Comments  For a mutual fund company, Steadyhand takes an unconventional approach by offering low-cost funds, co-investing along with clients, hiring portfolio managers who make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheilagh</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-192271</link>
		<dc:creator>sheilagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 04:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-192271</guid>
		<description>have you guys heard of a fund company called capital group?  they run american funds in the US, and charles ellis wrote a very flattering book on them.  i looked up their website and virtually all of their funds beat the index - how does that happen?  I heard they are available in Canada under the brand &quot;Capital International&quot; and their fees seem to be much lower than most brand name funds.....

any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you guys heard of a fund company called capital group?  they run american funds in the US, and charles ellis wrote a very flattering book on them.  i looked up their website and virtually all of their funds beat the index &#8211; how does that happen?  I heard they are available in Canada under the brand &#8220;Capital International&#8221; and their fees seem to be much lower than most brand name funds&#8230;..</p>
<p>any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Links &#124; The Canadian Finance Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-192003</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Links &#124; The Canadian Finance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-192003</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist looks into Steadyhand mutual funds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist looks into Steadyhand mutual funds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Random Thoughts Zero Inflation Week</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-192001</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Random Thoughts Zero Inflation Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-192001</guid>
		<description>[...] Capitalist does a review of Steadyhand Mutual Funds, sounds ok if that is how you want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Capitalist does a review of Steadyhand Mutual Funds, sounds ok if that is how you want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Lap Of The Blogs : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-191977</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lap Of The Blogs : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-191977</guid>
		<description>[...] Capitalist looks at Steadyhand Mutual Funds (run by former PH&amp;N top dog Tom Bradley). I&#8217;ve walked past their offices in Vancouver [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Capitalist looks at Steadyhand Mutual Funds (run by former PH&amp;N top dog Tom Bradley). I&#8217;ve walked past their offices in Vancouver [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-191964</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-191964</guid>
		<description>Ananke: I plan on writing about BRK and FFH. Thanks for the idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ananke: I plan on writing about BRK and FFH. Thanks for the idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ananke</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-191898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ananke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-191898</guid>
		<description>My &quot;actively managed&quot; fund is Fairfax Financial and Berkshire ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My &#8220;actively managed&#8221; fund is Fairfax Financial and Berkshire <img src='http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thicken My Wallet</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-191801</link>
		<dc:creator>Thicken My Wallet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-191801</guid>
		<description>The PH&amp;N series of mutual funds have relatively low MER and perform well compared to their peers. Tom Bradley was the CEO of PH&amp;N until 2005 so his fingerprints are all over both companies.

Now to see if RBC ruins it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PH&amp;N series of mutual funds have relatively low MER and perform well compared to their peers. Tom Bradley was the CEO of PH&amp;N until 2005 so his fingerprints are all over both companies.</p>
<p>Now to see if RBC ruins it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/steadyhand-mutual-funds/#comment-191799</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2395#comment-191799</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention that I hold the same opinion for fixed income as I do for large caps...  Why hold them in a fund and pay any MER at all?  It doesn&#039;t take a rocket scientist to buy a GIC or T-Bill.  It does take a little more consideration when looking at long bonds, but it&#039;s still not like brain surgery.  Besides, in a rising interest rate environment, holding individual securities is less risky because you&#039;re likely to get all of your principal amount back upon maturity, whereas that&#039;s not likely in a marked to market bond fund as they don&#039;t mature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention that I hold the same opinion for fixed income as I do for large caps&#8230;  Why hold them in a fund and pay any MER at all?  It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to buy a GIC or T-Bill.  It does take a little more consideration when looking at long bonds, but it&#8217;s still not like brain surgery.  Besides, in a rising interest rate environment, holding individual securities is less risky because you&#8217;re likely to get all of your principal amount back upon maturity, whereas that&#8217;s not likely in a marked to market bond fund as they don&#8217;t mature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

