<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short-Term versus Long-Term Bonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interest Rates are Heading Up &#124; Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-342661</link>
		<dc:creator>Interest Rates are Heading Up &#124; Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-342661</guid>
		<description>[...] yields also means that existing holdings will fall in value. Bond investors may want to consider shortening the duration of their bond holdings. Post a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yields also means that existing holdings will fall in value. Bond investors may want to consider shortening the duration of their bond holdings. Post a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: confused</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-325824</link>
		<dc:creator>confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-325824</guid>
		<description>Would it be better to invest in a short term bond etf or a long term bond etf? With 25 years plus until retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be better to invest in a short term bond etf or a long term bond etf? With 25 years plus until retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Primer on Bonds – II (Investing in Bonds) &#171; Finance Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-235965</link>
		<dc:creator>A Primer on Bonds – II (Investing in Bonds) &#171; Finance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-235965</guid>
		<description>[...] facing more fluctuations. It is true that the variation could go both ways but I’ll point to more knowledgeable  commentaries for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] facing more fluctuations. It is true that the variation could go both ways but I’ll point to more knowledgeable  commentaries for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Primer on Bonds – II (Investing in Bonds) &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-235954</link>
		<dc:creator>A Primer on Bonds – II (Investing in Bonds) &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-235954</guid>
		<description>[...] facing more fluctuations. It is true that the variation could go both ways but I’ll point to more knowledgeable  commentaries for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] facing more fluctuations. It is true that the variation could go both ways but I’ll point to more knowledgeable  commentaries for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-53369</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-53369</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. In fact, we are talking about the same thing. Instead of taking on interest rate risk for a lower expected return, it is better to take on market risk in equities for a higher expected return. Still, a bit of short bonds adds a bit of stability to a portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. In fact, we are talking about the same thing. Instead of taking on interest rate risk for a lower expected return, it is better to take on market risk in equities for a higher expected return. Still, a bit of short bonds adds a bit of stability to a portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinancialJungle.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-53339</link>
		<dc:creator>FinancialJungle.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-53339</guid>
		<description>My comments were more in the context of long bonds, but I like your perspective.  Renters&#039; rent obligations are reminiscent of bond coupons.  

As for RRSP, since it&#039;s meant as a retirement account, my preference is to hold equities (and perhaps short-bonds) instead of long bonds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comments were more in the context of long bonds, but I like your perspective.  Renters&#8217; rent obligations are reminiscent of bond coupons.  </p>
<p>As for RRSP, since it&#8217;s meant as a retirement account, my preference is to hold equities (and perhaps short-bonds) instead of long bonds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-53328</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 18:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-53328</guid>
		<description>FJ: We look at things from a slightly different perspective. For me, a home and the associated mortgage are not considered part of my investment portfolio. Even if you did, renters have to account for their own negative bond as well, by thinking of their rental payments as negative coupons.

Let&#039;s say that you have a mortgage and an investment portfolio, most or all of which is in RRSPs (I think this is a very common situation). Should you hold bonds then? I would say yes, at least a little bit because you are not giving up too much return and are lowering the overall portfolio volatility. But this is only true if you are able to hold bonds within the RRSP. A good case can be made for being 100% in stocks if an entire portfolio is in taxable accounts.

Mike: I suppose investors who bought 30-year bonds for their fixed income portion in the eighties would be very satisfied with the results. In general though, long bonds may not be worth the extra interest rate risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FJ: We look at things from a slightly different perspective. For me, a home and the associated mortgage are not considered part of my investment portfolio. Even if you did, renters have to account for their own negative bond as well, by thinking of their rental payments as negative coupons.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say that you have a mortgage and an investment portfolio, most or all of which is in RRSPs (I think this is a very common situation). Should you hold bonds then? I would say yes, at least a little bit because you are not giving up too much return and are lowering the overall portfolio volatility. But this is only true if you are able to hold bonds within the RRSP. A good case can be made for being 100% in stocks if an entire portfolio is in taxable accounts.</p>
<p>Mike: I suppose investors who bought 30-year bonds for their fixed income portion in the eighties would be very satisfied with the results. In general though, long bonds may not be worth the extra interest rate risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-53327</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 18:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-53327</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the analogy between mortgage and bonds either.  I am mortgage free as well, but I don&#039;t foresee my condo&#039;s value increasing at 4.5% a year for the next 10 yrs.  In fact, conventional wisdom says that home values tend to go in the opposite direction of mortgage interest rates...  Interest rates go up, homes become less affordable, fewer people can afford so it becomes a buyer&#039;s market as prices come down?

For long bonds, 25% of my RRSP is already in Real Return Bonds (bought a few years ago), which amazingly mature around the time that I hit retirement age so they worked out perfectly for me (GoC only sold two or three series of Real Return Bonds the last time I checked).  But that&#039;s the absolute most that I want to dump in that one single asset class - on ROBTV they recommend not to have more than 5% of your portfolio in a single investment.  As my RSP gets bigger with future contributions, I figure that my Real Return Bonds will some day eventually get down to 5%.  =0P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the analogy between mortgage and bonds either.  I am mortgage free as well, but I don&#8217;t foresee my condo&#8217;s value increasing at 4.5% a year for the next 10 yrs.  In fact, conventional wisdom says that home values tend to go in the opposite direction of mortgage interest rates&#8230;  Interest rates go up, homes become less affordable, fewer people can afford so it becomes a buyer&#8217;s market as prices come down?</p>
<p>For long bonds, 25% of my RRSP is already in Real Return Bonds (bought a few years ago), which amazingly mature around the time that I hit retirement age so they worked out perfectly for me (GoC only sold two or three series of Real Return Bonds the last time I checked).  But that&#8217;s the absolute most that I want to dump in that one single asset class &#8211; on ROBTV they recommend not to have more than 5% of your portfolio in a single investment.  As my RSP gets bigger with future contributions, I figure that my Real Return Bonds will some day eventually get down to 5%.  =0P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinancialJungle.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-53319</link>
		<dc:creator>FinancialJungle.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-53319</guid>
		<description>Mike - You&#039;re correct.  When you hold a $200,000 mortgage, you&#039;re essentially shorting bonds.  i.e. minus $200,000 in bonds.  Since I don&#039;t have a mortgage and my bond position is $0, I&#039;m holding $200,000 more bonds than a typical homeowner.

It doesn&#039;t make much sense for homeowners to hold long bonds, when they can earn higher and tax-free yields by paying down their mortgages.  BTW, inside RRSP, the yields are tax-deferred, not tax-free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; You&#8217;re correct.  When you hold a $200,000 mortgage, you&#8217;re essentially shorting bonds.  i.e. minus $200,000 in bonds.  Since I don&#8217;t have a mortgage and my bond position is $0, I&#8217;m holding $200,000 more bonds than a typical homeowner.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t make much sense for homeowners to hold long bonds, when they can earn higher and tax-free yields by paying down their mortgages.  BTW, inside RRSP, the yields are tax-deferred, not tax-free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourPillars</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds/#comment-53305</link>
		<dc:creator>FourPillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/07/04/short-term-versus-long-term-bonds#comment-53305</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of owning only short term bonds as per Bernstein but I also wonder if there isn&#039;t some diversification benefits to owning short, medium and long term bonds since they aren&#039;t always correlated to each other?

On the other hand, my main goal for investing in bonds is to offset volatility in the equities portion so if the short term bonds achieve that goal then that might be good enough.

FJ - I never understood the idea that a mortgage is akin to being invested in bonds, is this what you mean? or the opposite?

It seems to me that with a mortgage, you owe someone else money whereas bonds are the opposite - someone owes you money.  

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of owning only short term bonds as per Bernstein but I also wonder if there isn&#8217;t some diversification benefits to owning short, medium and long term bonds since they aren&#8217;t always correlated to each other?</p>
<p>On the other hand, my main goal for investing in bonds is to offset volatility in the equities portion so if the short term bonds achieve that goal then that might be good enough.</p>
<p>FJ &#8211; I never understood the idea that a mortgage is akin to being invested in bonds, is this what you mean? or the opposite?</p>
<p>It seems to me that with a mortgage, you owe someone else money whereas bonds are the opposite &#8211; someone owes you money.  </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

