<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Returns of the Top 10 Canadian Equity Funds (by assets) of 2004</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Friday Links &#8211; Anniversary Edition - Canadian Finance Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-210327</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Links &#8211; Anniversary Edition - Canadian Finance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-210327</guid>
		<description>[...] Their favorite &#8211; Returns of the Top 10 Canadian Equity Funds of 2004 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Their favorite &#8211; Returns of the Top 10 Canadian Equity Funds of 2004 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dj</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203979</link>
		<dc:creator>dj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203979</guid>
		<description>Jerry said:.&quot;I’ve been investing in CI Harbour for the last 10 or 11 years and this is the only Canadian large cap that I own.&quot;.........this fund lost more then 20% last year.........Jerry said:&quot; And I do not like my index fund loosing 40% when the underlying index does so, but I am OK with making “only” 20% when the index does 30%&quot;................so you pay a CFP to do what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry said:.&#8221;I’ve been investing in CI Harbour for the last 10 or 11 years and this is the only Canadian large cap that I own.&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;this fund lost more then 20% last year&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Jerry said:&#8221; And I do not like my index fund loosing 40% when the underlying index does so, but I am OK with making “only” 20% when the index does 30%&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.so you pay a CFP to do what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intelligent Speculator &#124; Financial Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203422</link>
		<dc:creator>Intelligent Speculator &#124; Financial Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203422</guid>
		<description>[...] @ BBC Buying stocks on margin@ FourPillars 5 good financial habits in your twenties @ MoneyUnder30 Returns of the top 10 Canadian Equity Funds @ CanadianCapitalist Gold moves to 1100$ @ WSJ When Money doesn&#8217;t matter @ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] @ BBC Buying stocks on margin@ FourPillars 5 good financial habits in your twenties @ MoneyUnder30 Returns of the top 10 Canadian Equity Funds @ CanadianCapitalist Gold moves to 1100$ @ WSJ When Money doesn&#8217;t matter @ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rat</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203240</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203240</guid>
		<description>Ouch...checked out some of those MERs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch&#8230;checked out some of those MERs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203237</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203237</guid>
		<description>@Jerry: Fair enough. I have no problems accepting that some managers are able to beat the index. But it is hard to tell luck and skill apart. Many managers who appear to be skilled turn out to be merely lucky. I&#039;m a passive investor and I control volatility by diversifying. The TSX did lose &gt; 30% last year but my portfolio was down a lot less even though I&#039;m mostly in stocks. The reason is bonds did well, US stocks weren&#039;t down that much etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jerry: Fair enough. I have no problems accepting that some managers are able to beat the index. But it is hard to tell luck and skill apart. Many managers who appear to be skilled turn out to be merely lucky. I&#8217;m a passive investor and I control volatility by diversifying. The TSX did lose &gt; 30% last year but my portfolio was down a lot less even though I&#8217;m mostly in stocks. The reason is bonds did well, US stocks weren&#8217;t down that much etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Returns of the Top 10 Canadian Equity Funds (by assets) of 2004 &#124; Canadian Capitalist -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Returns of the Top 10 Canadian Equity Funds (by assets) of 2004 &#124; Canadian Capitalist -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203227</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ray, Canadian Capitalist. Canadian Capitalist said: New Blog Post: Returns of the Top 10 Canadian Equity Funds (by assets) of 2004 http://bit.ly/1lJrIL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ray, Canadian Capitalist. Canadian Capitalist said: New Blog Post: Returns of the Top 10 Canadian Equity Funds (by assets) of 2004 <a href="http://bit.ly/1lJrIL" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1lJrIL</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203221</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203221</guid>
		<description>Call me naive, but I do not buy 10 mutual funds. I&#039;ve been investing in CI Harbour for the last 10 or 11 years and this is the only Canadian large cap that I own. I do believe that the best and the most consistent money managers can beat the index over the long run. And I do not like my index fund loosing 40% when the underlying index does so, but I am OK with making &quot;only&quot; 20% when the index does 30%. Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me naive, but I do not buy 10 mutual funds. I&#8217;ve been investing in CI Harbour for the last 10 or 11 years and this is the only Canadian large cap that I own. I do believe that the best and the most consistent money managers can beat the index over the long run. And I do not like my index fund loosing 40% when the underlying index does so, but I am OK with making &#8220;only&#8221; 20% when the index does 30%. Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203220</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203220</guid>
		<description>@Andy: I don&#039;t have access to Top 10 funds of 2005, 2006 etc. If someone has them, I&#039;d be happy to take a look. It would be interesting to see the turnover in the list.

@Henry: The list contains the largest mutual funds based on assets under management. According to Globefund PH&amp;N Canadian Equity has $860 million which won&#039;t put it in the top 10. Of course, investors would be better off looking at these smaller but low-fee funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy: I don&#8217;t have access to Top 10 funds of 2005, 2006 etc. If someone has them, I&#8217;d be happy to take a look. It would be interesting to see the turnover in the list.</p>
<p>@Henry: The list contains the largest mutual funds based on assets under management. According to Globefund PH&#038;N Canadian Equity has $860 million which won&#8217;t put it in the top 10. Of course, investors would be better off looking at these smaller but low-fee funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203204</link>
		<dc:creator>Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203204</guid>
		<description>Shorting mutual funds, now that&#039;s a winning idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorting mutual funds, now that&#8217;s a winning idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/returns-of-the-top-10-canadian-equity-funds-by-assets-of-2004/#comment-203170</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3085#comment-203170</guid>
		<description>The 2004 list is also very biased. If you notice, PH&amp;N and other mutual fund companies that do not have trailer fees are excluded. PH&amp;N and Saxon have very good Canadian equity funds.

Don&#039;t get me started on SMA200 again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2004 list is also very biased. If you notice, PH&amp;N and other mutual fund companies that do not have trailer fees are excluded. PH&amp;N and Saxon have very good Canadian equity funds.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me started on SMA200 again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
