<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rebalancing the Sleepy Portfolio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/rebalancing-the-sleepy-portfolio-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/rebalancing-the-sleepy-portfolio-2/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3Q-2008 Report Card</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/rebalancing-the-sleepy-portfolio-2/#comment-158379</link>
		<dc:creator>3Q-2008 Report Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1289#comment-158379</guid>
		<description>[...] 70% of the portfolio allocated to equities, the Sleepy Portfolio could not be expected to escape the carnage in the stock market. The portfolio was down 10% over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 70% of the portfolio allocated to equities, the Sleepy Portfolio could not be expected to escape the carnage in the stock market. The portfolio was down 10% over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/rebalancing-the-sleepy-portfolio-2/#comment-156391</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1289#comment-156391</guid>
		<description>nobleea: Probably not. Even with a large account like the Sleepy Portfolio, I considered selling some bonds to buy VWO but decided against it because the 1% deviation means spending $20 to sell and buy $1,600 worth of securities. It&#039;s a bit of a tough call but I think that it is best to make as little changes as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nobleea: Probably not. Even with a large account like the Sleepy Portfolio, I considered selling some bonds to buy VWO but decided against it because the 1% deviation means spending $20 to sell and buy $1,600 worth of securities. It&#8217;s a bit of a tough call but I think that it is best to make as little changes as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobleea</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/rebalancing-the-sleepy-portfolio-2/#comment-156373</link>
		<dc:creator>nobleea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1289#comment-156373</guid>
		<description>Just a general question, is there a certain dollar value below which it doesn&#039;t make sense to rebalance?  I mean, you want to keep your asset percentages as close to target as possible, but if you have a small account and a 5% divergence in one class only corresponds to say 800$, is it even worth rebalancing, once you take the commissions in to account?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a general question, is there a certain dollar value below which it doesn&#8217;t make sense to rebalance?  I mean, you want to keep your asset percentages as close to target as possible, but if you have a small account and a 5% divergence in one class only corresponds to say 800$, is it even worth rebalancing, once you take the commissions in to account?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

