<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portfolio Case Study 1, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195858</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195858</guid>
		<description>Regarding the cottage - think twice before buying.  They are a lot of work - similar to a second home.  Unless you have a lot of holidays (ie teacher) or can buy the cottage very close to where you live (and can use it a lot) then you might find that you end up spending most of your holidays doing work at the cottage.

My parents cottage costs about $8,000 per year - this includes everything including satellite tv, bills etc.  If you are only using a similar cottage for 4 weeks per year...well you can do the math.

Another alternative is shared owning - I know someone who bought a 1/10 share of a cottage - the admin is run by some company.  I think he pays $2500 per year for 5 weeks which are spread around the year and there is no work to do.

The other drawback of a cottage is that it limits your holidays so you won`t be able to go to other areas or countries as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the cottage &#8211; think twice before buying.  They are a lot of work &#8211; similar to a second home.  Unless you have a lot of holidays (ie teacher) or can buy the cottage very close to where you live (and can use it a lot) then you might find that you end up spending most of your holidays doing work at the cottage.</p>
<p>My parents cottage costs about $8,000 per year &#8211; this includes everything including satellite tv, bills etc.  If you are only using a similar cottage for 4 weeks per year&#8230;well you can do the math.</p>
<p>Another alternative is shared owning &#8211; I know someone who bought a 1/10 share of a cottage &#8211; the admin is run by some company.  I think he pays $2500 per year for 5 weeks which are spread around the year and there is no work to do.</p>
<p>The other drawback of a cottage is that it limits your holidays so you won`t be able to go to other areas or countries as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Location, Location, Location: Where to put portfolio components? &#124; Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195707</link>
		<dc:creator>Location, Location, Location: Where to put portfolio components? &#124; Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195707</guid>
		<description>[...] 15th, 2009 &#183;   In a recent series of posts, reader Phil was looking for feedback on his plans to split portfolio components across different [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 15th, 2009 &middot;   In a recent series of posts, reader Phil was looking for feedback on his plans to split portfolio components across different [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaby</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195662</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195662</guid>
		<description>Mark, I definitely will forego speculative buys and I don&#039;t consider options speculative, just something I don&#039;t have enough experience with, hence my taking time with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I definitely will forego speculative buys and I don&#8217;t consider options speculative, just something I don&#8217;t have enough experience with, hence my taking time with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195655</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195655</guid>
		<description>Best of luck on your DIY investing.

For what it is worth kids change everything. Your cash flow may change drastically for a long period of time, especially if one of you is going to be a stay-at-home parent for 5-7 years to raise the kids until they start school.

Try adjusting your budget to survive on a single income and see how your wants vs needs may have to change. It hit me harder than I thought it would, especially keeping a mortgage and car payment as the only debt. Everything can scale if you work at it hard enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best of luck on your DIY investing.</p>
<p>For what it is worth kids change everything. Your cash flow may change drastically for a long period of time, especially if one of you is going to be a stay-at-home parent for 5-7 years to raise the kids until they start school.</p>
<p>Try adjusting your budget to survive on a single income and see how your wants vs needs may have to change. It hit me harder than I thought it would, especially keeping a mortgage and car payment as the only debt. Everything can scale if you work at it hard enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195644</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195644</guid>
		<description>@ All, many thanks for your comments. I look forward to receiving more from Part 2, which discusses security selection. 
@ Howie, thanks for the tip about the Bernstein book. The main disadvantage I see with bond ETFs is that they put your principal at risk.    As for the Lifepoints, yours and other posts have made it clear that I should seriously consider selling it now!  There are no DSCs.  
@Charles in Vancouver, thank you for the idea about replicating underlying indices of the Lifepoints fund.  I agree that corporate bonds are an attractive asset class - the problem is that I have a lot to learn about understanding the complex features (e.g. callable, etc.) I think it&#039;s better to build a bond ladder with bonds that are not callable.
@Potato, I won&#039;t be able to harvest the capital loss b/c it&#039;s in an RSP.  But I still think selling at a loss is the way to go.  Like you said, &quot;YOu don&#039;t have to make it back the same way you lost it.&quot;  WHile buy and hold is a simple and easy-to-implement strategy, I&#039;ve become convinced that a better approach (even for long term investment horizon) is to use stops or, even better, trailing stops. 
@Mark Wolfinger, thank you very much for the suggestion to use collars.  I&#039;m going to read more about this strategy. I won&#039;t want to get involved with buying/selling options until and if I fully understand them.  I&#039;ve made the mistake before of buying something I didn&#039;t fully understand (leveraged ETFs from Betapro!)
@Phil S, thank you for suggestion re: cottage.  I&#039;ll have to look into that possibility.  
@CC, thanks for your insights into rebalancing.  I think the way to go is to devote all fresh contributions to fixed income.  I&#039;ve got a few (perhaps too many!) lines in the equity waters.  
@MJ, paying down debt is a personal preference of mine.  We recently refinanced and locked in at a pretty reasonable rate, but I still like to pay down as much as I can.  And you&#039;re probably right, with a family in tow I doubt I&#039;ll have enough free time to pen guest articles to the CC website to get investment advice so better get the house in order now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ All, many thanks for your comments. I look forward to receiving more from Part 2, which discusses security selection.<br />
@ Howie, thanks for the tip about the Bernstein book. The main disadvantage I see with bond ETFs is that they put your principal at risk.    As for the Lifepoints, yours and other posts have made it clear that I should seriously consider selling it now!  There are no DSCs.<br />
@Charles in Vancouver, thank you for the idea about replicating underlying indices of the Lifepoints fund.  I agree that corporate bonds are an attractive asset class &#8211; the problem is that I have a lot to learn about understanding the complex features (e.g. callable, etc.) I think it&#8217;s better to build a bond ladder with bonds that are not callable.<br />
@Potato, I won&#8217;t be able to harvest the capital loss b/c it&#8217;s in an RSP.  But I still think selling at a loss is the way to go.  Like you said, &#8220;YOu don&#8217;t have to make it back the same way you lost it.&#8221;  WHile buy and hold is a simple and easy-to-implement strategy, I&#8217;ve become convinced that a better approach (even for long term investment horizon) is to use stops or, even better, trailing stops.<br />
@Mark Wolfinger, thank you very much for the suggestion to use collars.  I&#8217;m going to read more about this strategy. I won&#8217;t want to get involved with buying/selling options until and if I fully understand them.  I&#8217;ve made the mistake before of buying something I didn&#8217;t fully understand (leveraged ETFs from Betapro!)<br />
@Phil S, thank you for suggestion re: cottage.  I&#8217;ll have to look into that possibility.<br />
@CC, thanks for your insights into rebalancing.  I think the way to go is to devote all fresh contributions to fixed income.  I&#8217;ve got a few (perhaps too many!) lines in the equity waters.<br />
@MJ, paying down debt is a personal preference of mine.  We recently refinanced and locked in at a pretty reasonable rate, but I still like to pay down as much as I can.  And you&#8217;re probably right, with a family in tow I doubt I&#8217;ll have enough free time to pen guest articles to the CC website to get investment advice so better get the house in order now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimster</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195632</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195632</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been investing for 21 years.
The markets are far too volatile these days.
You are relatively new to investing.
Therefore, stay out of the markets and stay in cash.
Learn - read books, etc.
Especially be careful of blogs like CC who have very fixed, and IMHO, very wrong views of investing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been investing for 21 years.<br />
The markets are far too volatile these days.<br />
You are relatively new to investing.<br />
Therefore, stay out of the markets and stay in cash.<br />
Learn &#8211; read books, etc.<br />
Especially be careful of blogs like CC who have very fixed, and IMHO, very wrong views of investing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wolfinger</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195600</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wolfinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195600</guid>
		<description>Gaby,

Please do not misunderstand me.  I was NOT suggesting that you ever BUY options as a speculation.  I strongly advise my readers against buying options or using them for gambling.

I was suggesting ONLY conservative - risk reducing - option strategies, such as the collar.  Buy whatever assets you want, but protect them - or at least that&#039;s my message.

Best of luck to you.

Here&#039;s an example of how a collar works:
http://tinyurl.com/lwxo4x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaby,</p>
<p>Please do not misunderstand me.  I was NOT suggesting that you ever BUY options as a speculation.  I strongly advise my readers against buying options or using them for gambling.</p>
<p>I was suggesting ONLY conservative &#8211; risk reducing &#8211; option strategies, such as the collar.  Buy whatever assets you want, but protect them &#8211; or at least that&#8217;s my message.</p>
<p>Best of luck to you.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example of how a collar works:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/lwxo4x" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/lwxo4x</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195585</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195585</guid>
		<description>Hi Phil,

Congratulations on taking the plunge into DIY investing.  Since you are just starting out I would advise you stick with the basics (equities and fixed income) for now.

You&#039;ve chosen one of the most challenging times in quite a while (in my lifetime, anyways) to invest.  Government fixed income is offering paltry rates of return, and carry a significant risk of loss should inflation rear its head.  Meanwhile equities, after the current rally, are arguably quite expensive.  

Given this challenging investment environment, you&#039;d be well served to consider what Kannucker mentioned about paying down your mortgage and other debts.  If your mortgage rate is 5%, you can earn a guaranteed 5% by paying down the principal.  In my opinion you&#039;d be hard pressed to earn that in a conservative, balanced portfolio under these circumstances. Best of all, there&#039;s no fees (provided you have a mortgage that allows this sort of thing)!  It&#039;s good to hear you&#039;ve paid down your student loans; that&#039;s a very smart move.  

If you are still dead set on investing additional funds, you could sitll contribute to RRSPs and use the tax refund to pay down your mortgage principal.  

Re: balancing, as CC said, you can either rebalance by actively selling an existing position to buy another, or by ensuring all your fresh contributions go the underweight share until you&#039;ve reached your target allocation.  If your regular contributions are a small percentage (say &lt;1%) of your total portfolio, and your allocation is out of whack by say 10% or more, you may want to go with option number 1.  Don&#039;t get hung up on maintaining a perfect allocation at all times; to do so would entail daily buy and sell transactions that would very quickly erode your investment capital. 

It&#039;s difficult for me to give portfolio advice without knowing the size of your portfolio.  For the vast majority of folks your age, it makes more sense to buy diversified bond funds then individual bonds.  In this environment, be very cautious of inflation down the road.  I&#039;d advise you stick to bonds/bond funds with a short maturities - they are less volatile than long bond funds.  If you want to juice your returns, consider including high grade, short-term corporate bonds.  Most government paper is yielding little at the moment.  Ishares has some good bond funds.

I&#039;d also go the passive route (ETFs) with equities.  Pick a global equity allocation, and use ETFs to make it happen.  I generally advise about 1/3 each to Can, US, and World.  I wouldn&#039;t put more than half in any category.  In Canada, Ishares has some nice products for this purpose.  I also like TD&#039;s low fee offerings here, too.  You seem to be concerned about the $US (as am I).  Currency hedged ETFs are available that give exposure to the US and MSCI for a relatively low MER (however note the hedging is in addition to the MER).  

As you&#039;re both working and looking to start a family, I&#039;d stock with 100% passive investing for now.  Even if you have the inclination, in all likelihood you won&#039;t have the time to keep abreast of individual securities.  

Make a wise plan, be disciplined to stick to it, and spend an hour or two roughly once a quarter or six months to review performance, rebalance, and consider any changes to your plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil,</p>
<p>Congratulations on taking the plunge into DIY investing.  Since you are just starting out I would advise you stick with the basics (equities and fixed income) for now.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve chosen one of the most challenging times in quite a while (in my lifetime, anyways) to invest.  Government fixed income is offering paltry rates of return, and carry a significant risk of loss should inflation rear its head.  Meanwhile equities, after the current rally, are arguably quite expensive.  </p>
<p>Given this challenging investment environment, you&#8217;d be well served to consider what Kannucker mentioned about paying down your mortgage and other debts.  If your mortgage rate is 5%, you can earn a guaranteed 5% by paying down the principal.  In my opinion you&#8217;d be hard pressed to earn that in a conservative, balanced portfolio under these circumstances. Best of all, there&#8217;s no fees (provided you have a mortgage that allows this sort of thing)!  It&#8217;s good to hear you&#8217;ve paid down your student loans; that&#8217;s a very smart move.  </p>
<p>If you are still dead set on investing additional funds, you could sitll contribute to RRSPs and use the tax refund to pay down your mortgage principal.  </p>
<p>Re: balancing, as CC said, you can either rebalance by actively selling an existing position to buy another, or by ensuring all your fresh contributions go the underweight share until you&#8217;ve reached your target allocation.  If your regular contributions are a small percentage (say &lt;1%) of your total portfolio, and your allocation is out of whack by say 10% or more, you may want to go with option number 1.  Don&#8217;t get hung up on maintaining a perfect allocation at all times; to do so would entail daily buy and sell transactions that would very quickly erode your investment capital. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s difficult for me to give portfolio advice without knowing the size of your portfolio.  For the vast majority of folks your age, it makes more sense to buy diversified bond funds then individual bonds.  In this environment, be very cautious of inflation down the road.  I&#8217;d advise you stick to bonds/bond funds with a short maturities &#8211; they are less volatile than long bond funds.  If you want to juice your returns, consider including high grade, short-term corporate bonds.  Most government paper is yielding little at the moment.  Ishares has some good bond funds.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also go the passive route (ETFs) with equities.  Pick a global equity allocation, and use ETFs to make it happen.  I generally advise about 1/3 each to Can, US, and World.  I wouldn&#8217;t put more than half in any category.  In Canada, Ishares has some nice products for this purpose.  I also like TD&#8217;s low fee offerings here, too.  You seem to be concerned about the $US (as am I).  Currency hedged ETFs are available that give exposure to the US and MSCI for a relatively low MER (however note the hedging is in addition to the MER).  </p>
<p>As you&#8217;re both working and looking to start a family, I&#8217;d stock with 100% passive investing for now.  Even if you have the inclination, in all likelihood you won&#8217;t have the time to keep abreast of individual securities.  </p>
<p>Make a wise plan, be disciplined to stick to it, and spend an hour or two roughly once a quarter or six months to review performance, rebalance, and consider any changes to your plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195581</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195581</guid>
		<description>The first thing I would do is figure out whether there is going to be a cost (penalty) to sell your current funds.  Even if there is a penalty, you should weigh that against the underperformance of the fund (versus an index).  Ie if you need to pay $500 to get out, but the fund is underperforming by $300 a year and you&#039;re not able to get out without penalty for another 3 years, it makes sense to just sell it.  This is the take home message: at some point the markets will start moving up again, and when they do you want to be in the most cost-efficient portfolio you can so you get the best bang for your buck.

If that&#039;s the case, you then need to decide on your bonds/equity split.  At your age you should probably be 30-40% bonds, but obviously the timing isn&#039;t fantastic right now to do that.  I am a DIY passive investor but allow myself to provide some rationale into my approach.  At your age I would increase my bond exposure to 20%, leave 80% in equities to capture as much of the upside as possible, and invest any new money into bonds until either it reaches its target or a specified amount of time has passed (ie give 2 years for equity recovery then rebalance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing I would do is figure out whether there is going to be a cost (penalty) to sell your current funds.  Even if there is a penalty, you should weigh that against the underperformance of the fund (versus an index).  Ie if you need to pay $500 to get out, but the fund is underperforming by $300 a year and you&#8217;re not able to get out without penalty for another 3 years, it makes sense to just sell it.  This is the take home message: at some point the markets will start moving up again, and when they do you want to be in the most cost-efficient portfolio you can so you get the best bang for your buck.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case, you then need to decide on your bonds/equity split.  At your age you should probably be 30-40% bonds, but obviously the timing isn&#8217;t fantastic right now to do that.  I am a DIY passive investor but allow myself to provide some rationale into my approach.  At your age I would increase my bond exposure to 20%, leave 80% in equities to capture as much of the upside as possible, and invest any new money into bonds until either it reaches its target or a specified amount of time has passed (ie give 2 years for equity recovery then rebalance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Portfolio Case Study 1, Part 2 &#124; Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/portfolio-case-study-1-part-1/#comment-195578</link>
		<dc:creator>Portfolio Case Study 1, Part 2 &#124; Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2682#comment-195578</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8592; Portfolio Case Study 1, Part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &larr; Portfolio Case Study 1, Part 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

