<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Pitfalls&#8221; of Indexing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-155620</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-155620</guid>
		<description>Hi CC,

I guess that shows that even pensions funds follow the rule of thumb - 90% of all transactions are stupid. This is exactly why the average investor only gets 1/3 of the return of the funds they own (Dalbar 20-year study).

They are dumping 3 fund managers that have all beaten the index by wide margins over long periods of time because they have a &quot;tracking error&quot;? These managers only beat the index by being very different from the index - not from trying to track it.

All the great value managers have underperformed for the last several years. They have been telling us that 2004-8  are just like 1995-9 in that the same sectors keep going up and up far beyond what the fundamentals support, while solid undervalued companies are mostly not rising.

Only those that hold on through periods of underperformance will get the index-beating returns of the top fund managers.


Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi CC,</p>
<p>I guess that shows that even pensions funds follow the rule of thumb &#8211; 90% of all transactions are stupid. This is exactly why the average investor only gets 1/3 of the return of the funds they own (Dalbar 20-year study).</p>
<p>They are dumping 3 fund managers that have all beaten the index by wide margins over long periods of time because they have a &#8220;tracking error&#8221;? These managers only beat the index by being very different from the index &#8211; not from trying to track it.</p>
<p>All the great value managers have underperformed for the last several years. They have been telling us that 2004-8  are just like 1995-9 in that the same sectors keep going up and up far beyond what the fundamentals support, while solid undervalued companies are mostly not rising.</p>
<p>Only those that hold on through periods of underperformance will get the index-beating returns of the top fund managers.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-155602</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-155602</guid>
		<description>Cogsy: There is tons of discussion on currency effects in the archives. I personally prefer direct holding in US stocks because (a) they are cheaper (b) hedging has debatable benefits but certain costs including bad tracking error.

Ed: I&#039;ve read that article. It&#039;s reprinted in the appendix of &quot;The Intelligent Investor&quot;. Now, I have no doubt that Warren Buffett can tell you who can outperform the market in advance. I only question whether your average investor or advisor can. The overwhelming evidence is they can&#039;t. For instance, check out the travails of Bill Miller:

http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN0645707620080806</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cogsy: There is tons of discussion on currency effects in the archives. I personally prefer direct holding in US stocks because (a) they are cheaper (b) hedging has debatable benefits but certain costs including bad tracking error.</p>
<p>Ed: I&#8217;ve read that article. It&#8217;s reprinted in the appendix of &#8220;The Intelligent Investor&#8221;. Now, I have no doubt that Warren Buffett can tell you who can outperform the market in advance. I only question whether your average investor or advisor can. The overwhelming evidence is they can&#8217;t. For instance, check out the travails of Bill Miller:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN0645707620080806" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN0645707620080806</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-155379</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 01:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-155379</guid>
		<description>Hi CC,

Have you read Warren Buffett&#039;s article &quot;The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville&quot;? Here is a link:(http://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/null/CIER?exclusive=filemgr.download&amp;file_id=645551&amp;showthumb=0 .

How do you explain that these 8 guys Warren bumped into all ended up beating the index by large margins over decades? He knew all these guys would out-perform ahead of time.

His point is that there is much inefficiency, that the market price is determined by the single most greedy or most depressed investor, and that academics continue to argue that the markets are efficient, while the super-investors of Graham-and-Doddsville continue to beat the indexes.

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi CC,</p>
<p>Have you read Warren Buffett&#8217;s article &#8220;The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville&#8221;? Here is a link:(<a href="http://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/null/CIER?exclusive=filemgr.download&#038;file_id=645551&#038;showthumb=0" rel="nofollow">http://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/null/CIER?exclusive=filemgr.download&#038;file_id=645551&#038;showthumb=0</a> .</p>
<p>How do you explain that these 8 guys Warren bumped into all ended up beating the index by large margins over decades? He knew all these guys would out-perform ahead of time.</p>
<p>His point is that there is much inefficiency, that the market price is determined by the single most greedy or most depressed investor, and that academics continue to argue that the markets are efficient, while the super-investors of Graham-and-Doddsville continue to beat the indexes.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Market Correction, Web Hosting and Weekend Reading - Sept 12, 2008 &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-155092</link>
		<dc:creator>Market Correction, Web Hosting and Weekend Reading - Sept 12, 2008 &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-155092</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squawkfox &#187; Chickens, Tomatoes, and Links Oh My!</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-153891</link>
		<dc:creator>squawkfox &#187; Chickens, Tomatoes, and Links Oh My!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-153891</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist: &#8220;Pitfalls&#8221; of Indexing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist: &#8220;Pitfalls&#8221; of Indexing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Money Madness &#124; Rich Credit Debt Loan</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-153812</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Money Madness &#124; Rich Credit Debt Loan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-153812</guid>
		<description>[...] “Pitfalls” of indexing at Canadian Capitalist responds to Million Dollar Journey’s 4 reasons why index investing may not be for you. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Pitfalls” of indexing at Canadian Capitalist responds to Million Dollar Journey’s 4 reasons why index investing may not be for you. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Dividend Investing Roundup - September 6, 2008 &#187; The Dividend Guy Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-153566</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Dividend Investing Roundup - September 6, 2008 &#187; The Dividend Guy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-153566</guid>
		<description>[...] The pitfalls of indexing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The pitfalls of indexing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cogsy</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-153476</link>
		<dc:creator>Cogsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-153476</guid>
		<description>A friend and I were talking about Swensen&#039;s approach to investing.  I have ordered the book &quot;Unconventional Success&quot; and it is in the mail.  We were wondering if a few of you could give a Canadian version of a Swensen portfolio so that we would not have to convert some of our money to US dollars.  I am going to start with the e-Series portfolio similar to the Spleepy Portfolio but we were curious what funds we would need to mirror Swensen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend and I were talking about Swensen&#8217;s approach to investing.  I have ordered the book &#8220;Unconventional Success&#8221; and it is in the mail.  We were wondering if a few of you could give a Canadian version of a Swensen portfolio so that we would not have to convert some of our money to US dollars.  I am going to start with the e-Series portfolio similar to the Spleepy Portfolio but we were curious what funds we would need to mirror Swensen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Lap Of The Blogs : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-153294</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lap Of The Blogs : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-153294</guid>
		<description>[...] last but not least, Canadian Capitalist responds to the Million Dollar Journey&#8217;s post about the &#8220;pitfalls&#8221; of investing in index [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last but not least, Canadian Capitalist responds to the Million Dollar Journey&#8217;s post about the &#8220;pitfalls&#8221; of investing in index [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Jungle</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/pitfalls-of-indexing/#comment-153265</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Jungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1234#comment-153265</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Now, if I only invested my life savings in Berkshire Hathaway back in ‘75…. (I was not born yet, but if only…)

Apparently index investors chose to ignore $100 bills on the floor.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/21834492</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Now, if I only invested my life savings in Berkshire Hathaway back in ‘75…. (I was not born yet, but if only…)</p>
<p>Apparently index investors chose to ignore $100 bills on the floor.<br />
<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/21834492" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/21834492</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

