<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Note to Kevin O&#8217;Leary: Don&#8217;t Confuse GDP Growth with Stock Market Returns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Clement</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-515223</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-515223</guid>
		<description>kevin Oleary quote on cbc.  &quot;i&#039;m happy jack layton is in opposition because he has no teeth&quot;

Just watch Jack Layton chew harper&#039;s butt until he can&#039;t sit down.   He will be better than Ignatiev at

ripping the conservative policies apart.   Buying new unecessary jets is a great deficit reduction plan.

Canada will need many more Billions to maintain and service them not identified by harper.

Good analysis Kevin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kevin Oleary quote on cbc.  &#8220;i&#8217;m happy jack layton is in opposition because he has no teeth&#8221;</p>
<p>Just watch Jack Layton chew harper&#8217;s butt until he can&#8217;t sit down.   He will be better than Ignatiev at</p>
<p>ripping the conservative policies apart.   Buying new unecessary jets is a great deficit reduction plan.</p>
<p>Canada will need many more Billions to maintain and service them not identified by harper.</p>
<p>Good analysis Kevin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-452956</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-452956</guid>
		<description>Just another Donald Trump, balloons all eventually come down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another Donald Trump, balloons all eventually come down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostryder</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-208406</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghostryder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-208406</guid>
		<description>Ahhh yes. Kevin O&#039;Leary.  He of the &quot;gov&#039;t subsidies are bad&quot; who has 2 shows on the CBC which is subsidised to the tune of over $1 billion tax dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh yes. Kevin O&#8217;Leary.  He of the &#8220;gov&#8217;t subsidies are bad&#8221; who has 2 shows on the CBC which is subsidised to the tune of over $1 billion tax dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Weekend Links &#171; Daily News</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-208229</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Weekend Links &#171; Daily News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-208229</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist has some investing advice for Kevin O&#8217;Leary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist has some investing advice for Kevin O&#8217;Leary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Random Thoughts: So Many Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-208172</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Random Thoughts: So Many Questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-208172</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist bites back at a Shark, by writing a Note to Kevin O&#8217;Leary: Don&#8217;t confuse GDP Growth with Stock Market Returns hopefuly Mr. O&#8217;Leary won&#8217;t bite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist bites back at a Shark, by writing a Note to Kevin O&#8217;Leary: Don&#8217;t confuse GDP Growth with Stock Market Returns hopefuly Mr. O&#8217;Leary won&#8217;t bite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Lap Of The Blogs : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-208169</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lap Of The Blogs : WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-208169</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist offers Kevin O&#8217;Leary a scolding. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist offers Kevin O&#8217;Leary a scolding. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-208166</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-208166</guid>
		<description>@MJ:  That&#039;s why all of these shows have the disclaimer that the views are not of the station and always consult with an investment advisor before choosing any of their recommendations...  Blah blah blah...  It&#039;s the same thing as going to a fortune teller - they state that their psychic readings are &quot;for entertainment purposes only&quot; and so you should only look at them that way.

I don&#039;t really watch the Lang &amp; O&#039;Leary Exchange on CBC, but I used to watch them on Squeezeplay.  I occasionally find O&#039;Leary&#039;s rants amusing, but usually only when he does it right in front of a guest who is a CEO or economist or union leader or whatever.  The reason why I find it amusing is because it usually elicits some sort of a reaction from the guest and I&#039;m always curious about what that reaction is...  Regardless, he is a buffoon and he plays that role on TV in order to get reactions.  That&#039;s what&#039;s interesting and what sells.

@CC, Michael James &amp; Dale Rathgeber:  Your long exchange here looks like a group of so-called &quot;technical investors&quot; who all think they found the perfect mathematical model for the stock market.  For me, I am a stock picker and I mainly pick stocks on fundamentals.  I have to like the business that they&#039;re in, the management team should have a history of making smart moves, they need to have a clean balance sheet and a healthy cash flow statement.  Oh, and I also like to get in at a price that is below the majority of the officer&#039;s stock option strike price and I will only buy when the P/E multiple is in the single digits and my preference is for dividend yielding stocks.  The trend chart itself is really irrelevant to me if the rest of everything looks good.

With all of that being said, I&#039;d have to agree that there&#039;s next to nothing that&#039;s a screaming buying out there right now.  That hasn&#039;t stopped me from making some small speculative purchases on stuff like Natural Gas futures and some junior mining companies.  But those are small speculative investments, small meaning 1% of my total portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MJ:  That&#8217;s why all of these shows have the disclaimer that the views are not of the station and always consult with an investment advisor before choosing any of their recommendations&#8230;  Blah blah blah&#8230;  It&#8217;s the same thing as going to a fortune teller &#8211; they state that their psychic readings are &#8220;for entertainment purposes only&#8221; and so you should only look at them that way.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really watch the Lang &amp; O&#8217;Leary Exchange on CBC, but I used to watch them on Squeezeplay.  I occasionally find O&#8217;Leary&#8217;s rants amusing, but usually only when he does it right in front of a guest who is a CEO or economist or union leader or whatever.  The reason why I find it amusing is because it usually elicits some sort of a reaction from the guest and I&#8217;m always curious about what that reaction is&#8230;  Regardless, he is a buffoon and he plays that role on TV in order to get reactions.  That&#8217;s what&#8217;s interesting and what sells.</p>
<p>@CC, Michael James &amp; Dale Rathgeber:  Your long exchange here looks like a group of so-called &#8220;technical investors&#8221; who all think they found the perfect mathematical model for the stock market.  For me, I am a stock picker and I mainly pick stocks on fundamentals.  I have to like the business that they&#8217;re in, the management team should have a history of making smart moves, they need to have a clean balance sheet and a healthy cash flow statement.  Oh, and I also like to get in at a price that is below the majority of the officer&#8217;s stock option strike price and I will only buy when the P/E multiple is in the single digits and my preference is for dividend yielding stocks.  The trend chart itself is really irrelevant to me if the rest of everything looks good.</p>
<p>With all of that being said, I&#8217;d have to agree that there&#8217;s next to nothing that&#8217;s a screaming buying out there right now.  That hasn&#8217;t stopped me from making some small speculative purchases on stuff like Natural Gas futures and some junior mining companies.  But those are small speculative investments, small meaning 1% of my total portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-208136</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-208136</guid>
		<description>I almost forgot to take a shot at O&#039;leary!  I find that kind of show (Lang &amp; O&#039;leary exchange) to be despicable, and it has no place on our public broadcaster.  It will do much more harm than good, giving out daily advice ala Cramer on CNBC.  The vast majority of viewers don&#039;t have the background to adequately process it, and I cringe when I think what horrible decisions they may make based on his random musings...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost forgot to take a shot at O&#8217;leary!  I find that kind of show (Lang &amp; O&#8217;leary exchange) to be despicable, and it has no place on our public broadcaster.  It will do much more harm than good, giving out daily advice ala Cramer on CNBC.  The vast majority of viewers don&#8217;t have the background to adequately process it, and I cringe when I think what horrible decisions they may make based on his random musings&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-208134</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-208134</guid>
		<description>It is very true that GDP growth is not necessarily correlated to equity market returns.  The reason IMO is two-fold:

1.  Often times the growth is already priced into equities.  The soundness of an investment is the excess of the intrinsic value compared to the price paid.

2.  Growth often isn&#039;t profitable for corporations in the short-term or medium-term.  Look at all those tech stocks in the tech bubble that were trading at multi-billion market caps despite having never made one red cent (and many of them never did!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very true that GDP growth is not necessarily correlated to equity market returns.  The reason IMO is two-fold:</p>
<p>1.  Often times the growth is already priced into equities.  The soundness of an investment is the excess of the intrinsic value compared to the price paid.</p>
<p>2.  Growth often isn&#8217;t profitable for corporations in the short-term or medium-term.  Look at all those tech stocks in the tech bubble that were trading at multi-billion market caps despite having never made one red cent (and many of them never did!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/note-to-kevin-oleary-dont-confuse-gdp-growth-with-stock-market-returns/#comment-208130</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3312#comment-208130</guid>
		<description>Dale:  My views and approach couldn&#039;t be further from being religious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale:  My views and approach couldn&#8217;t be further from being religious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

