<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Green Shoots says Warren Buffett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200532</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200532</guid>
		<description>@Rob.  Preferred shares are inherently better than common shares at downside protection, but it&#039;s not quite as good as bonds.  If the underlying company starts to lose money, they will cut the dividends to common shareholders but they must continue to maintain dividends to preferred shareholders.  And the buyback &quot;strike&quot; price for preferred shares is as much of a guaranteed price as the underlying company&#039;s credit quality will allow.
So, if times are good and money grows on trees and all you have to do is rake it in, then maybe common shares will outperform.  If things aren&#039;t quite so happy, then common shareholders are usually completely wiped out (see Air Canada) while preferred shareholders and bondholders at least get something back.  Because a lot of times, someone like Buffett will make a private placement when the companies are in distress, they often give away the farm to get the cash - but when things turn around, they will often dilute the common shares in an effort to buy out the private placements because they were often raw deals for the companies.  Great for the likes of Warren Buffett et al, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob.  Preferred shares are inherently better than common shares at downside protection, but it&#8217;s not quite as good as bonds.  If the underlying company starts to lose money, they will cut the dividends to common shareholders but they must continue to maintain dividends to preferred shareholders.  And the buyback &#8220;strike&#8221; price for preferred shares is as much of a guaranteed price as the underlying company&#8217;s credit quality will allow.<br />
So, if times are good and money grows on trees and all you have to do is rake it in, then maybe common shares will outperform.  If things aren&#8217;t quite so happy, then common shareholders are usually completely wiped out (see Air Canada) while preferred shareholders and bondholders at least get something back.  Because a lot of times, someone like Buffett will make a private placement when the companies are in distress, they often give away the farm to get the cash &#8211; but when things turn around, they will often dilute the common shares in an effort to buy out the private placements because they were often raw deals for the companies.  Great for the likes of Warren Buffett et al, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pacific</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200470</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacific</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200470</guid>
		<description>Rob, could you elaborate on your statement:

 (you can get a piece when earnings grow via bigger dividends).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, could you elaborate on your statement:</p>
<p> (you can get a piece when earnings grow via bigger dividends).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200459</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200459</guid>
		<description>What?

First of all, preferred shares are not inherently better than common stock, in fact, common stock has some advantages (you can get a piece when earnings grow via bigger dividends).

Second, maybe the blog needs a &quot;no un-medicated commenting&quot; rule. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?</p>
<p>First of all, preferred shares are not inherently better than common stock, in fact, common stock has some advantages (you can get a piece when earnings grow via bigger dividends).</p>
<p>Second, maybe the blog needs a &#8220;no un-medicated commenting&#8221; rule. <img src='http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200388</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200388</guid>
		<description>Hey wait a minute now, folks!  Slow down!!!  When Warren Buffett buys stocks, it has been well publicized that he has been buying preferred shares with dividend yields in excess of 10% per annum with buy-back prices which are 40% to 50% above his original cost!!!  He&#039;s not buying the same crappy common shares that the rest of us schmucks have access to...  These preferred shares that he&#039;s buying are private placements which are ONLY issued to Berkshire Hathaway and are NOT exchange listed securities!  If you offered anybody else the same deal, well duh, everybody would jump at them.  In reality, we&#039;re the sheep who get led to the slaughter based upon this advice if we dive into those crappy common shares because the common shares will lose their dividend and take a nosedive in price in order to support the dividend payments to Warren Buffett&#039;s preferred shares!!!  It&#039;s in Buffett&#039;s best interest to talk up the shares because that is the equity that will be used to buy back the shares that he owns at a 50% capital gain to him!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey wait a minute now, folks!  Slow down!!!  When Warren Buffett buys stocks, it has been well publicized that he has been buying preferred shares with dividend yields in excess of 10% per annum with buy-back prices which are 40% to 50% above his original cost!!!  He&#8217;s not buying the same crappy common shares that the rest of us schmucks have access to&#8230;  These preferred shares that he&#8217;s buying are private placements which are ONLY issued to Berkshire Hathaway and are NOT exchange listed securities!  If you offered anybody else the same deal, well duh, everybody would jump at them.  In reality, we&#8217;re the sheep who get led to the slaughter based upon this advice if we dive into those crappy common shares because the common shares will lose their dividend and take a nosedive in price in order to support the dividend payments to Warren Buffett&#8217;s preferred shares!!!  It&#8217;s in Buffett&#8217;s best interest to talk up the shares because that is the equity that will be used to buy back the shares that he owns at a 50% capital gain to him!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200380</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200380</guid>
		<description>In the broader market, irrational exuberance is taking hold.  The rally is well ahead of the fundamentals.  In some cases, like the share price for AIG, it&#039;s absolutely insane.

For long-term investing, I&#039;m buying based on intrinsic value and dividend income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the broader market, irrational exuberance is taking hold.  The rally is well ahead of the fundamentals.  In some cases, like the share price for AIG, it&#8217;s absolutely insane.</p>
<p>For long-term investing, I&#8217;m buying based on intrinsic value and dividend income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200374</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200374</guid>
		<description>Buffet is right, this has happened time and time again in financial markets, tulip bulb craze in holland, the south sea bubble in engliand, the buble before the great depression with market manipulators, nifty fifty, and dotcom bubble. Valuations get completely out of hand and noone can even recall any of the lessons learned from the previous crash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffet is right, this has happened time and time again in financial markets, tulip bulb craze in holland, the south sea bubble in engliand, the buble before the great depression with market manipulators, nifty fifty, and dotcom bubble. Valuations get completely out of hand and noone can even recall any of the lessons learned from the previous crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pacific</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200366</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacific</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200366</guid>
		<description>Do you know what I think? The average Joe is realizing that the market CAN go up again, as it has since March 09, and is getting back in. Institutionals are also getting back in, too afraid of NOT being in. The Canadians and American money leaders are saying the recession is over. 

Look at the P/E ratios, US consumer spending, left-over job and housing numbers, and it doesn&#039;t look good. Many &#039;Guestimators&quot; are saying this is a dangerous time. We are in Sept.and October, traditional shakeout months. I agree, there could be a huge sudden drop, so I have stops in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know what I think? The average Joe is realizing that the market CAN go up again, as it has since March 09, and is getting back in. Institutionals are also getting back in, too afraid of NOT being in. The Canadians and American money leaders are saying the recession is over. </p>
<p>Look at the P/E ratios, US consumer spending, left-over job and housing numbers, and it doesn&#8217;t look good. Many &#8216;Guestimators&#8221; are saying this is a dangerous time. We are in Sept.and October, traditional shakeout months. I agree, there could be a huge sudden drop, so I have stops in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyEnergy</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200339</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyEnergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200339</guid>
		<description>Of course, I wonder if that includes the debt he owns as well... and currencies.  He might be talking mainly about U.S. companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I wonder if that includes the debt he owns as well&#8230; and currencies.  He might be talking mainly about U.S. companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyEnergy</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200338</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyEnergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200338</guid>
		<description>Glad Buffett is still around to talk to us all about what he thinks.  But yes, quite interesting that even he doesn&#039;t see green shoots in over 70 businesses.  Wow.  And you know what he owns, too..... yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad Buffett is still around to talk to us all about what he thinks.  But yes, quite interesting that even he doesn&#8217;t see green shoots in over 70 businesses.  Wow.  And you know what he owns, too&#8230;.. yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/no-green-shoots-says-warren-buffett/#comment-200337</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2953#comment-200337</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the pointer to the Buffett interview.  My main takeaway is that Buffett finds valuations low enough to buy based on intrinsic value.  Hopefully that means that I&#039;m doing the right thing being over 95% invested in stocks right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pointer to the Buffett interview.  My main takeaway is that Buffett finds valuations low enough to buy based on intrinsic value.  Hopefully that means that I&#8217;m doing the right thing being over 95% invested in stocks right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

