<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finding a Financial Advisor: The Screening Process &#124; Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-244991</link>
		<dc:creator>Finding a Financial Advisor: The Screening Process &#124; Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-244991</guid>
		<description>[...] series of posts continues in Part 2 and Part 3. Post a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] series of posts continues in Part 2 and Part 3. Post a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Finding a Financial Advisor: The Interview Process &#124; Canadian Capitalist -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-233283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Finding a Financial Advisor: The Interview Process &#124; Canadian Capitalist -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-233283</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Barrie Conrod, Tim West. Tim West said: Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 2 http://ow.ly/2bEwY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Barrie Conrod, Tim West. Tim West said: Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 2 <a href="http://ow.ly/2bEwY" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/2bEwY</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Roundup: Pennsylvania, County Fairs and Car Sales Edition at Clever Dude Personal Finance &#38; Money</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-144522</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Roundup: Pennsylvania, County Fairs and Car Sales Edition at Clever Dude Personal Finance &#38; Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-144522</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist continues his series on finding a financial adviser. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist continues his series on finding a financial adviser. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-144027</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-144027</guid>
		<description>MoneyPower: Thanks for your explanation. Reading the post again, I realize the wording is sloppy. Ruth and Jane were mainly fee-based planners but also did fee-only planning, which they mentioned were a very small part of their service. I&#039;ll make this clear in the next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MoneyPower: Thanks for your explanation. Reading the post again, I realize the wording is sloppy. Ruth and Jane were mainly fee-based planners but also did fee-only planning, which they mentioned were a very small part of their service. I&#8217;ll make this clear in the next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_Z</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-144025</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-144025</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation  MoneyPower, it is pretty clear now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation  MoneyPower, it is pretty clear now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyPower</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-143988</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyPower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-143988</guid>
		<description>There seems to be some confusion about fee-only planning and fee-based investment management, implicitly in this discussion and in the population in general.  

A fee-only financial planner will prepared a comprehensive financial plan, covering such aspects as cash flow projections, debt management, tax planning and strategy, risk management, insurance needs, investment strategy and estate planning.  The fee-only planner may or may not be licensed to  sell investments.  If he or she is not licensed, he or she cannot give advice about  specific individual investments  He or she can talk about asset allocation, costs, risk factors,  but cannot tell  you if you should buy or sell ABC  stock or LMNOP mutual fund .If he or she is licensed, then specific investment advice can be part of the process.

When the original poster talks about &quot;Ruth&quot; and &quot;June&quot; offering fee-only planning and then says they are charging an asset under management fee of 2%, the concept gets blurred.  The fee here is for investment management, and not for fee-only comprehensive financial planning, although there may be an element of comprehensive planning offered for the fee. And it is an on-going fee, not a one-time fee. This a is fee-based advisory service, not fee-only planning.

Disclosure:  I am a financial advisor who is licensed, and who offers both fee-only financial planning and fee-based investment management services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be some confusion about fee-only planning and fee-based investment management, implicitly in this discussion and in the population in general.  </p>
<p>A fee-only financial planner will prepared a comprehensive financial plan, covering such aspects as cash flow projections, debt management, tax planning and strategy, risk management, insurance needs, investment strategy and estate planning.  The fee-only planner may or may not be licensed to  sell investments.  If he or she is not licensed, he or she cannot give advice about  specific individual investments  He or she can talk about asset allocation, costs, risk factors,  but cannot tell  you if you should buy or sell ABC  stock or LMNOP mutual fund .If he or she is licensed, then specific investment advice can be part of the process.</p>
<p>When the original poster talks about &#8220;Ruth&#8221; and &#8220;June&#8221; offering fee-only planning and then says they are charging an asset under management fee of 2%, the concept gets blurred.  The fee here is for investment management, and not for fee-only comprehensive financial planning, although there may be an element of comprehensive planning offered for the fee. And it is an on-going fee, not a one-time fee. This a is fee-based advisory service, not fee-only planning.</p>
<p>Disclosure:  I am a financial advisor who is licensed, and who offers both fee-only financial planning and fee-based investment management services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venter</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-143895</link>
		<dc:creator>venter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-143895</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m making the assumption that all assets are in a FE load fund, if DSC or Low Load, trailers are 0.5% instead of 1% so cut the 22k in half. In bad markets m trailers will decrease as well, no matter how good the plan is, of course I benefit in up markets. Much of the 22k is generated from new business. LL or DSC is often used to rebate any fees clients are charged from DSC fees from previous advisors (I always rebate these fees).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m making the assumption that all assets are in a FE load fund, if DSC or Low Load, trailers are 0.5% instead of 1% so cut the 22k in half. In bad markets m trailers will decrease as well, no matter how good the plan is, of course I benefit in up markets. Much of the 22k is generated from new business. LL or DSC is often used to rebate any fees clients are charged from DSC fees from previous advisors (I always rebate these fees).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul_Z</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-143831</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul_Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-143831</guid>
		<description>Sorry Venter, I did not mean to be mean or anything. It is not an easy job that&#039;s for sure, it anything goes wrong you are the one always getting blamed. By the way I&#039;m not employed in the financial industry, therefore probably have some limited knowledge about financial advisers compare to the most of the readers.  Let me ask you a question, are those 22k in fees will be charged again the second year and the one after that if those assets stay with the company? It wasn&#039;t clear the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Venter, I did not mean to be mean or anything. It is not an easy job that&#8217;s for sure, it anything goes wrong you are the one always getting blamed. By the way I&#8217;m not employed in the financial industry, therefore probably have some limited knowledge about financial advisers compare to the most of the readers.  Let me ask you a question, are those 22k in fees will be charged again the second year and the one after that if those assets stay with the company? It wasn&#8217;t clear the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venter</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-143829</link>
		<dc:creator>venter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-143829</guid>
		<description>I brought in around 1.5 million in assets under my management in my first year as an advisor and made a whopping $22k in fees. I don&#039;t think I&#039;m living high off the hog on the backs of my clients. Perhaps Paul_Z can tell me how I can make what he makes at his job without charging some sort of fees. Even at 2 mill. assets under management and a 1% trailer or fee only charge, I would be paid 70%(after expenses charged by firm I work through) of 20k in fees. Then I have my own expenses and tax. I don&#039;t expect to get rich, just make the average wage everybody else gets. I&#039;m getting really tired of all the advisor bashing. All I want to do is help my clients to the best of my abilities and make a living in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I brought in around 1.5 million in assets under my management in my first year as an advisor and made a whopping $22k in fees. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m living high off the hog on the backs of my clients. Perhaps Paul_Z can tell me how I can make what he makes at his job without charging some sort of fees. Even at 2 mill. assets under management and a 1% trailer or fee only charge, I would be paid 70%(after expenses charged by firm I work through) of 20k in fees. Then I have my own expenses and tax. I don&#8217;t expect to get rich, just make the average wage everybody else gets. I&#8217;m getting really tired of all the advisor bashing. All I want to do is help my clients to the best of my abilities and make a living in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NN</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/finding-a-financial-advisor-part-2/#comment-143716</link>
		<dc:creator>NN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=1005#comment-143716</guid>
		<description>uhm, the table&#039;s spacing suddenly vanished...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uhm, the table&#8217;s spacing suddenly vanished&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

