<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Budget Highlights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal-Budget &#187; Federal Budget Spending and the National Debt</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-147845</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal-Budget &#187; Federal Budget Spending and the National Debt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-147845</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by Federal-Budget &#8230;Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by The Conservative Tax TrickIn Budget 2007, the Tories introduced “a broadly revenue-neutral” rebate program that offered up to $2000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by Federal-Budget &#8230;Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by The Conservative Tax TrickIn Budget 2007, the Tories introduced “a broadly revenue-neutral” rebate program that offered up to $2000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal-Budget &#187; DSC_063626924 - Ujjal DOSANJH &#38; Alex STOJICEVIC</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-141265</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal-Budget &#187; DSC_063626924 - Ujjal DOSANJH &#38; Alex STOJICEVIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-141265</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by The Conservative Tax TrickIn Budget 2007, the Tories introduced “a broadly revenue-neutral” rebate program that offered up to $2000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the same time imposing a “green levy” of up to $4000 on gas-guzzling &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by The Conservative Tax TrickIn Budget 2007, the Tories introduced “a broadly revenue-neutral” rebate program that offered up to $2000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the same time imposing a “green levy” of up to $4000 on gas-guzzling &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal-Budget &#187; Learn to Engage in the Federal Budget Process</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-140138</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal-Budget &#187; Learn to Engage in the Federal Budget Process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-140138</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by Federal-Budget » Now it&#039;s &#8230;Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by The Conservative Tax TrickIn Budget 2007, the Tories introduced “a broadly revenue-neutral” rebate program that offered up to $2000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by Federal-Budget » Now it&#39;s &#8230;Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by The Conservative Tax TrickIn Budget 2007, the Tories introduced “a broadly revenue-neutral” rebate program that offered up to $2000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal-Budget &#187; Now it&#39;s your turn to balance the federal budget!</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-139848</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal-Budget &#187; Now it&#39;s your turn to balance the federal budget!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-139848</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by The Conservative Tax TrickIn Budget 2007, the Tories introduced “a broadly revenue-neutral” rebate program that offered up to $2000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the same time imposing a “green levy” of up to $4000 on gas-guzzling &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Federal Budget Highlights by The Conservative Tax TrickIn Budget 2007, the Tories introduced “a broadly revenue-neutral” rebate program that offered up to $2000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the same time imposing a “green levy” of up to $4000 on gas-guzzling &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Conservative Tax Trick</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-137504</link>
		<dc:creator>The Conservative Tax Trick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-137504</guid>
		<description>[...] In Budget 2007, the Tories introduced &#8220;a broadly revenue-neutral&#8221; rebate program that offered up to $2,000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the same time imposing a &#8220;green levy&#8221; of up to $4,000 on gas-guzzling vehicles such as SUVs (but not trucks). In this year&#8217;s budget, they decided to scrap the green rebate, while keeping the green levy. It is hypocritical of the Conservatives to warn that we &#8220;better not fall for this trick&#8221;, when they themselves played a similar green trick on Canadians. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Budget 2007, the Tories introduced &#8220;a broadly revenue-neutral&#8221; rebate program that offered up to $2,000 for the purchase of a new fuel-efficient automobile while at the same time imposing a &#8220;green levy&#8221; of up to $4,000 on gas-guzzling vehicles such as SUVs (but not trucks). In this year&#8217;s budget, they decided to scrap the green rebate, while keeping the green levy. It is hypocritical of the Conservatives to warn that we &#8220;better not fall for this trick&#8221;, when they themselves played a similar green trick on Canadians. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007: A Retrospective</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-97519</link>
		<dc:creator>2007: A Retrospective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-97519</guid>
		<description>[...] Federal Budget in March introduced major changes to RESPs and introduced a new child tax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Federal Budget in March introduced major changes to RESPs and introduced a new child tax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Rittinger</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-25366</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Rittinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-25366</guid>
		<description>Did the trial balloon re income splitting for seniors pop?
When I retired, gas was about - but usually under - $.60 per litre  - now over $1.00, my health/life insurance was $139.00 per month - now over $400.00.
Out of pocket health and dental last year - over $9,000.00. Yikes! - and I know we are better off than many other seniors.I appreciate what the minister has done but...
How about a little more help, Mr Flaherty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the trial balloon re income splitting for seniors pop?<br />
When I retired, gas was about &#8211; but usually under &#8211; $.60 per litre  &#8211; now over $1.00, my health/life insurance was $139.00 per month &#8211; now over $400.00.<br />
Out of pocket health and dental last year &#8211; over $9,000.00. Yikes! &#8211; and I know we are better off than many other seniors.I appreciate what the minister has done but&#8230;<br />
How about a little more help, Mr Flaherty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-24944</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-24944</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, assuming any kind of return at all - you are better off front loading your contributions because the extra compounding time will make up for the lack of grants.

ie contributing $4k/year for 9 years (and only getting half the grant) will give you a bigger pot than putting in $2k/year even though you get the full grant.

Personally I&#039;m not too worried about maxing the resp - it&#039;s a future obligation and I have quite a few current obligations to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, assuming any kind of return at all &#8211; you are better off front loading your contributions because the extra compounding time will make up for the lack of grants.</p>
<p>ie contributing $4k/year for 9 years (and only getting half the grant) will give you a bigger pot than putting in $2k/year even though you get the full grant.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m not too worried about maxing the resp &#8211; it&#8217;s a future obligation and I have quite a few current obligations to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-24934</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-24934</guid>
		<description>Alex: The short answer is yes. But you can only get a CESG of either $500 or $1000 depending on your grant room. And I believe you would also lose future CESG grants because you are now maxed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex: The short answer is yes. But you can only get a CESG of either $500 or $1000 depending on your grant room. And I believe you would also lose future CESG grants because you are now maxed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/federal-budget-highlights-2/#comment-24933</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2007/03/19/federal-budget-highlights-2#comment-24933</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little bit confused when they say that the $4000 annual RESP contribution limit has been eleminated. What does this mean? If I have $50 000  now and never contributed to an RESP before, does it mean that I can (in theory) in one shot make $50 000 and never have to worry again about RESP until my child turns 18?

thanks,
Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little bit confused when they say that the $4000 annual RESP contribution limit has been eleminated. What does this mean? If I have $50 000  now and never contributed to an RESP before, does it mean that I can (in theory) in one shot make $50 000 and never have to worry again about RESP until my child turns 18?</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

