<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheating on taxes and Benford&#8217;s Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoppers Drug Mart, Clutter, Budgets and More &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-216269</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoppers Drug Mart, Clutter, Budgets and More &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-216269</guid>
		<description>[...] Cheating on taxes and Benford’s Law @ Canadian Capitalist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cheating on taxes and Benford’s Law @ Canadian Capitalist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Stock</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215768</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Stock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215768</guid>
		<description>Interesting... never heard of it being applied to tax audits.  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; never heard of it being applied to tax audits.  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djaypee</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215763</link>
		<dc:creator>Djaypee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215763</guid>
		<description>I first heard about Benford&#039;s law doing Sarbanes-Oxley pre-auditing. I&#039;m not at all surprised the CRA are using it.

Cheaters beware!

And to Rob and Alex:  you are absolutely right! Learn the rules and stay within reason!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first heard about Benford&#8217;s law doing Sarbanes-Oxley pre-auditing. I&#8217;m not at all surprised the CRA are using it.</p>
<p>Cheaters beware!</p>
<p>And to Rob and Alex:  you are absolutely right! Learn the rules and stay within reason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215752</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215752</guid>
		<description>Want to stay out of trouble with CRA and still save money?

Learn the rules (most don&#039;t), follow the rules (most don&#039;t), but adjust your situation to fit within the rules (most don&#039;t).

Easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to stay out of trouble with CRA and still save money?</p>
<p>Learn the rules (most don&#8217;t), follow the rules (most don&#8217;t), but adjust your situation to fit within the rules (most don&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCarriage</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215732</link>
		<dc:creator>MCarriage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215732</guid>
		<description>Very good read.  Its apparent that I need to brush up on my tax law.  Like Alex says, its prob the best idea to not cheat on the income side especially. Just don&#039;t go out of control with the deductions because that still can raise red flags and result in some unwanted headaches, I watched a friend go through it and it pretty much scared me straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good read.  Its apparent that I need to brush up on my tax law.  Like Alex says, its prob the best idea to not cheat on the income side especially. Just don&#8217;t go out of control with the deductions because that still can raise red flags and result in some unwanted headaches, I watched a friend go through it and it pretty much scared me straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215730</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215730</guid>
		<description>My opinion: Never cheat on the income side. On the expense side (if you&#039;re self employed) and if you&#039;re not sure of a deduction - claim it! Within reason, of course. If you&#039;re a fashion model, claim your hair-do, noserings, etc but not if you&#039;re a doctor. In which case claim your lab coat, stethoscope and tongue depressors, etc. Benford&#039;s law be damned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion: Never cheat on the income side. On the expense side (if you&#8217;re self employed) and if you&#8217;re not sure of a deduction &#8211; claim it! Within reason, of course. If you&#8217;re a fashion model, claim your hair-do, noserings, etc but not if you&#8217;re a doctor. In which case claim your lab coat, stethoscope and tongue depressors, etc. Benford&#8217;s law be damned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215727</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215727</guid>
		<description>Checked that post - good lord, what an epic discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checked that post &#8211; good lord, what an epic discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215723</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215723</guid>
		<description>@Jon D: IIRC, CRA wanted to see the receipts for the first year our kids were in daycare but not the second. Perhaps, CRA surely checks the receipts for the first year and randomly thereafter? It is going to be impossible to check everyone&#039;s receipts for the HRTC. I think CRA will probably just do random checks. I&#039;m keeping my receipts around just in case.

@Ben: Charitable donations are gamed here as well through charitable tax shelters. Check the comments on this old post to see how surreal it can get:

http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/beware-of-tax-shelter-donation-arrangements/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jon D: IIRC, CRA wanted to see the receipts for the first year our kids were in daycare but not the second. Perhaps, CRA surely checks the receipts for the first year and randomly thereafter? It is going to be impossible to check everyone&#8217;s receipts for the HRTC. I think CRA will probably just do random checks. I&#8217;m keeping my receipts around just in case.</p>
<p>@Ben: Charitable donations are gamed here as well through charitable tax shelters. Check the comments on this old post to see how surreal it can get:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/beware-of-tax-shelter-donation-arrangements/" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/beware-of-tax-shelter-donation-arrangements/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215718</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215718</guid>
		<description>Very interesting - I&#039;d never heard of Benford&#039;s Law.  Appears there are a lot of people in the US cheating on their charitable donations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting &#8211; I&#8217;d never heard of Benford&#8217;s Law.  Appears there are a lot of people in the US cheating on their charitable donations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon D.</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheating-on-taxes-and-benfords-law/#comment-215717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=3667#comment-215717</guid>
		<description>2008 was our first year where we had a full year&#039;s worth of child care ($12,000) and could claim the full $7,000 and bang on CRA requested to see the receipt.  Same thing for 2009 so we&#039;ll see come the summer again if they request it.  
 The HRTC will also be another one will be interesting to see how they treat it.  I had a roof and windows replaced so nearly reached the max with 2 receipts - but can you imagine someone sending in dozens of Home Depot receipts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008 was our first year where we had a full year&#8217;s worth of child care ($12,000) and could claim the full $7,000 and bang on CRA requested to see the receipt.  Same thing for 2009 so we&#8217;ll see come the summer again if they request it.<br />
 The HRTC will also be another one will be interesting to see how they treat it.  I had a roof and windows replaced so nearly reached the max with 2 receipts &#8211; but can you imagine someone sending in dozens of Home Depot receipts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

