<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheaper Mortgage Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheaper-mortgage-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheaper-mortgage-insurance/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hustlermoneyblog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheaper-mortgage-insurance/#comment-13320</link>
		<dc:creator>Hustlermoneyblog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/12/01/cheaper-mortgage-insurance#comment-13320</guid>
		<description>what about do a 80-15-5 loan? why not just do a 5% down payment to avoid the PMI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about do a 80-15-5 loan? why not just do a 5% down payment to avoid the PMI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StingyJoe</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheaper-mortgage-insurance/#comment-13297</link>
		<dc:creator>StingyJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/12/01/cheaper-mortgage-insurance#comment-13297</guid>
		<description>Like you said, the article has introduced legislation that the min downpayment required will be 20% instead of 25%.  However, whether or not the bill will pass legislation is another issue altogether.  Like most Canadians, I hope the bill does pass.

Joe
http://www.StingyFinance.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you said, the article has introduced legislation that the min downpayment required will be 20% instead of 25%.  However, whether or not the bill will pass legislation is another issue altogether.  Like most Canadians, I hope the bill does pass.</p>
<p>Joe<br />
<a href="http://www.StingyFinance.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.StingyFinance.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil S</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cheaper-mortgage-insurance/#comment-13270</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/12/01/cheaper-mortgage-insurance#comment-13270</guid>
		<description>Who in their right mind would get a mortgage for 100% of the value of their home?  The interest rate would likely be so high that your payments would be interest-only!  The only circumstance that would make sense would be to buy a relatively inexpensive shoebox condo, but even then, if you can&#039;t afford to put anything down, why are you getting one?  Rent it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who in their right mind would get a mortgage for 100% of the value of their home?  The interest rate would likely be so high that your payments would be interest-only!  The only circumstance that would make sense would be to buy a relatively inexpensive shoebox condo, but even then, if you can&#8217;t afford to put anything down, why are you getting one?  Rent it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

