<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash-for-Clunkers Program Coming to Canada?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-211240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-211240</guid>
		<description>If our government was interested in reducing carbon emissions, it should focus on getting old vehicles off the road and not offering up incentives with public money to assist people who can afford to purchase new vehicles.  I would like to see fewer vehicles on the road, not newer.  They should be increasing the incentive from $300 to $3000 and stop subsidizing auto manufacturers who are offering up ridiculous discounts for new vehicle purchases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If our government was interested in reducing carbon emissions, it should focus on getting old vehicles off the road and not offering up incentives with public money to assist people who can afford to purchase new vehicles.  I would like to see fewer vehicles on the road, not newer.  They should be increasing the incentive from $300 to $3000 and stop subsidizing auto manufacturers who are offering up ridiculous discounts for new vehicle purchases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Retire Your Ride Program &#124; Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-200253</link>
		<dc:creator>The Retire Your Ride Program &#124; Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-200253</guid>
		<description>[...] 14th, 2009 &#183; No Comments  The Federal Government has decided against implementing a cash-for-clunkers program in Canada because car manufacturers were not willing to settle for anything that offered less than a $3,000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 14th, 2009 &middot; No Comments  The Federal Government has decided against implementing a cash-for-clunkers program in Canada because car manufacturers were not willing to settle for anything that offered less than a $3,000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-198335</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-198335</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the incentive could be no tax on a vehicle no older than 3 years and the first year of insurance free when trading in an 10 yr or older vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the incentive could be no tax on a vehicle no older than 3 years and the first year of insurance free when trading in an 10 yr or older vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ohri</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-197913</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ohri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-197913</guid>
		<description>We must have this program for clunkers. After buying new vehicle Govt gets most of the rebate back in taxes any way and keeps the oil leaking and unsafe vehicles off the road. This program elligibility should include any new vehicle purchased between Jan 1 to Dec 31, 2009. The old vehicle should be atleaset 12 years old. Everyone wins. Autosector  keeps people employed and reduces EI burden and keeps mony flow in the system. Recession? What recession. We can reduce the financial impact only if our politicians can get their gears in motion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must have this program for clunkers. After buying new vehicle Govt gets most of the rebate back in taxes any way and keeps the oil leaking and unsafe vehicles off the road. This program elligibility should include any new vehicle purchased between Jan 1 to Dec 31, 2009. The old vehicle should be atleaset 12 years old. Everyone wins. Autosector  keeps people employed and reduces EI burden and keeps mony flow in the system. Recession? What recession. We can reduce the financial impact only if our politicians can get their gears in motion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-197877</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-197877</guid>
		<description>Everyone who thinks this would put a huge increase in the deficit is missing the big picture.  Unlike in the US, most of the rebate that is given in this would be redeemed in sales taxes.  For example, a $4500 rebate would get back $3250 of it in HST in the maritime provinces, on the purchase of a $25000 car.  Thus it is only effectively $1250 of an actual rebate, not $4500.

It is a good idea.  It gets older vehicles off the road, provides a boost to auto sector, and saves people money on gas when in the future it goes to $2 a liter (and it will, without government intervention).

Fuel taxes are a bad idea.  They won&#039;t stop pollution, they will just bankrupt people that HAVE to drive.  Not everyone lives in a huge metro area with a great mass transit system.  People in Toronto and Winnipeg will never understand the lives of everyone else in Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone who thinks this would put a huge increase in the deficit is missing the big picture.  Unlike in the US, most of the rebate that is given in this would be redeemed in sales taxes.  For example, a $4500 rebate would get back $3250 of it in HST in the maritime provinces, on the purchase of a $25000 car.  Thus it is only effectively $1250 of an actual rebate, not $4500.</p>
<p>It is a good idea.  It gets older vehicles off the road, provides a boost to auto sector, and saves people money on gas when in the future it goes to $2 a liter (and it will, without government intervention).</p>
<p>Fuel taxes are a bad idea.  They won&#8217;t stop pollution, they will just bankrupt people that HAVE to drive.  Not everyone lives in a huge metro area with a great mass transit system.  People in Toronto and Winnipeg will never understand the lives of everyone else in Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-196305</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-196305</guid>
		<description>Rather than spending all that money on subsidies and giving them to car owners, the government should take that money and SERIOUSLY IMPROVE public transit. If they extended the skytain/subways, the people would actually use them because they could get to and from work faster and cheaper, and it is better for the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than spending all that money on subsidies and giving them to car owners, the government should take that money and SERIOUSLY IMPROVE public transit. If they extended the skytain/subways, the people would actually use them because they could get to and from work faster and cheaper, and it is better for the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-195468</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-195468</guid>
		<description>I too am in a position to take advantage of this rebate if the government does offer it. However I do think it is a giant waste of government money at a time when the fiscal deficit is already large enough.

As Canadian Capitalist points out about all it is doing is transferring future demand to current demand. In my opinion this will not make the car companies any better off. The only result is that Canadians will pay higher taxes in the future to offset the increased budget deficit. 

My 2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am in a position to take advantage of this rebate if the government does offer it. However I do think it is a giant waste of government money at a time when the fiscal deficit is already large enough.</p>
<p>As Canadian Capitalist points out about all it is doing is transferring future demand to current demand. In my opinion this will not make the car companies any better off. The only result is that Canadians will pay higher taxes in the future to offset the increased budget deficit. </p>
<p>My 2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unemployment Numbers up a Little</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-195338</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unemployment Numbers up a Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-195338</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist asks is Cash For Clunkers Coming to Canada? Is it a wise thing for the government to delve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist asks is Cash For Clunkers Coming to Canada? Is it a wise thing for the government to delve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Review-Welcome Globe and Mail Readers Edition &#124; Financial Highway</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-195328</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Review-Welcome Globe and Mail Readers Edition &#124; Financial Highway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-195328</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist has a great discussion going; Cash-for-Clunkers Program coming to Canada. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist has a great discussion going; Cash-for-Clunkers Program coming to Canada. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bemerson</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/cash-for-clunkers-program-coming-to-canada/#comment-195293</link>
		<dc:creator>Bemerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=2649#comment-195293</guid>
		<description>@sid – Yes, that would make more sense. However, they want people to actually take advantage of this program. I’m out in the suburbs (GTA), and you couldn’t PAY me to take public transit. Too unreliable, too slow, and too inflexible. Public transit is for dense cities or commuting to work. Not for getting kids to daycare, shopping, visiting friends, etc (at least not in the suburbs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sid – Yes, that would make more sense. However, they want people to actually take advantage of this program. I’m out in the suburbs (GTA), and you couldn’t PAY me to take public transit. Too unreliable, too slow, and too inflexible. Public transit is for dense cities or commuting to work. Not for getting kids to daycare, shopping, visiting friends, etc (at least not in the suburbs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

