<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A scheme to save 100 percent of income tax? No thanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Reduce Your Income Tax</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-248245</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Reduce Your Income Tax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-248245</guid>
		<description>[...] because of other bloggers like Canadian Capitalist taking offence to the strategy in a post called A Scheme to save 100% of Income Tax &#8211; No Thanks. Larry Macdonald of Canadian Business Online also had a word in his post Tax Schemes and Financial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] because of other bloggers like Canadian Capitalist taking offence to the strategy in a post called A Scheme to save 100% of Income Tax &#8211; No Thanks. Larry Macdonald of Canadian Business Online also had a word in his post Tax Schemes and Financial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interview With A Marked Man &#124; WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-243993</link>
		<dc:creator>Interview With A Marked Man &#124; WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-243993</guid>
		<description>[...] Canadian Capitalist: A scheme to 100% of income taxes? No Thanks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canadian Capitalist: A scheme to 100% of income taxes? No Thanks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oren Gutman</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-238636</link>
		<dc:creator>Oren Gutman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-238636</guid>
		<description>@Canadian Capitalist: yes, that is the same Martin. Funny enough, that is a badge that he proudly wears and gladly shares information about. Again, we will discuss all these issues with Preet in the podcast and then you can all come to your final verdict at that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Canadian Capitalist: yes, that is the same Martin. Funny enough, that is a badge that he proudly wears and gladly shares information about. Again, we will discuss all these issues with Preet in the podcast and then you can all come to your final verdict at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-238504</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-238504</guid>
		<description>@Oren: I didn&#039;t get a response from Martin on the Canadian Business website. Is your business partner Martin Horvath, the same person who has been subjected to disciplinary action by the MFDA?

http://search.mfda.ca/search/?sp_q=martin+horvath&amp;sp_a=sp10038bec&amp;sp_p=all&amp;sp_f=iso-8859-1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Oren: I didn&#8217;t get a response from Martin on the Canadian Business website. Is your business partner Martin Horvath, the same person who has been subjected to disciplinary action by the MFDA?</p>
<p><a href="http://search.mfda.ca/search/?sp_q=martin+horvath&#038;sp_a=sp10038bec&#038;sp_p=all&#038;sp_f=iso-8859-1" rel="nofollow">http://search.mfda.ca/search/?sp_q=martin+horvath&#038;sp_a=sp10038bec&#038;sp_p=all&#038;sp_f=iso-8859-1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oren Gutman</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-237481</link>
		<dc:creator>Oren Gutman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-237481</guid>
		<description>Thank you for all the comments and mentioning our original interview with Larry. Preet from Where Does All My Money Go was actually kind enough to suggest we have a phone interview/podcast to discuss all these issues, so you can all look forward to that next week for all your concerns to be answered.

All the best,
Oren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for all the comments and mentioning our original interview with Larry. Preet from Where Does All My Money Go was actually kind enough to suggest we have a phone interview/podcast to discuss all these issues, so you can all look forward to that next week for all your concerns to be answered.</p>
<p>All the best,<br />
Oren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-237467</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-237467</guid>
		<description>@AKA: True. A better idea would be to earn enough to put taxable income just under the first tax bracket. The tax is fairly low and the standard of living would be much better. As a bonus, those with children will receive hefty CCTB transfer payments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AKA: True. A better idea would be to earn enough to put taxable income just under the first tax bracket. The tax is fairly low and the standard of living would be much better. As a bonus, those with children will receive hefty CCTB transfer payments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKA</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-237421</link>
		<dc:creator>AKA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-237421</guid>
		<description>I was expecting something along the lines of only making enough money to cover one&#039;s personal exemptions plus any applicable deductions.  Simple and legitimate, but leaves much to be desired from a standard of living perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was expecting something along the lines of only making enough money to cover one&#8217;s personal exemptions plus any applicable deductions.  Simple and legitimate, but leaves much to be desired from a standard of living perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Random Thoughts: Long Weekend Ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-237224</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Personal Finance Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Random Thoughts: Long Weekend Ahead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-237224</guid>
		<description>[...] Capitalist commented on A Scheme to Save 100% of income Tax? which he pans, and rightfully so, but he is really commenting on the original article by Larry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Capitalist commented on A Scheme to Save 100% of income Tax? which he pans, and rightfully so, but he is really commenting on the original article by Larry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry macdonald</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-237023</link>
		<dc:creator>larry macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-237023</guid>
		<description>CC
I thought CRA would have indicated to callers that they were rolling the dice -- like the promoter did in the post. Oh well, live and learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC<br />
I thought CRA would have indicated to callers that they were rolling the dice &#8212; like the promoter did in the post. Oh well, live and learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/a-scheme-to-save-100-percent-of-income-tax-no-thanks/#comment-236984</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=4051#comment-236984</guid>
		<description>@Larry: Unfortunately, the CRA may not provide a straightforward answer to questions about a tax avoidance scheme&#039;s validity. If the scheme here involves questions of legality, the CRA is likely to deny the deduction in its reassessment and take up the matter in tax court. At least, that&#039;s the strategy the CRA follows in tax shelter gifting arrangements.

@Mike: I can&#039;t make up my mind on whether you did the right thing. Yes, they get a link back from your site but the comments from skeptics in that post might give some food for thought for anyone wondering about the motives of the author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Larry: Unfortunately, the CRA may not provide a straightforward answer to questions about a tax avoidance scheme&#8217;s validity. If the scheme here involves questions of legality, the CRA is likely to deny the deduction in its reassessment and take up the matter in tax court. At least, that&#8217;s the strategy the CRA follows in tax shelter gifting arrangements.</p>
<p>@Mike: I can&#8217;t make up my mind on whether you did the right thing. Yes, they get a link back from your site but the comments from skeptics in that post might give some food for thought for anyone wondering about the motives of the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

