<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3Q-2006 Report Card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/3q-2006-report-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/3q-2006-report-card/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/3q-2006-report-card/#comment-9216</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/04/3q-2006-report-card#comment-9216</guid>
		<description>I fully realize that there are problems facing L and it might still go down from here. However, I think L&#039;s problems are temporary and fixable. I&#039;ll make a post about my thesis for investing in L.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully realize that there are problems facing L and it might still go down from here. However, I think L&#8217;s problems are temporary and fixable. I&#8217;ll make a post about my thesis for investing in L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hepman</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/3q-2006-report-card/#comment-9215</link>
		<dc:creator>hepman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/04/3q-2006-report-card#comment-9215</guid>
		<description>Recent weakness is related to possible strike. I think at these prices L is a good long-term defensive holding but may have more short-term downward pressure. I&#039;d recommend standing firm if you already hold it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent weakness is related to possible strike. I think at these prices L is a good long-term defensive holding but may have more short-term downward pressure. I&#8217;d recommend standing firm if you already hold it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investorial</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/3q-2006-report-card/#comment-9203</link>
		<dc:creator>Investorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2006/10/04/3q-2006-report-card#comment-9203</guid>
		<description>I wanted to know if your investment thesis on Loblaws has changed? Are you contemplating averaging down, standing firm, or exit?

http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/10/04/averaging-down-playing-chicken-with-mr-market/

Loblaws is getting more and more interesting the lower the stock price gets. But a cheap price is only a cheap price. Lemons have cheap prices too. I haven&#039;t yet made the necessary research to probe about valuation yet. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to know if your investment thesis on Loblaws has changed? Are you contemplating averaging down, standing firm, or exit?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/10/04/averaging-down-playing-chicken-with-mr-market/" rel="nofollow">http://www.investorgeeks.com/articles/2006/10/04/averaging-down-playing-chicken-with-mr-market/</a></p>
<p>Loblaws is getting more and more interesting the lower the stock price gets. But a cheap price is only a cheap price. Lemons have cheap prices too. I haven&#8217;t yet made the necessary research to probe about valuation yet. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

