<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2Q-2008 Report Card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleepy Portfolio 1Q-2011 Report Card &#171; MoneySense</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-468354</link>
		<dc:creator>Sleepy Portfolio 1Q-2011 Report Card &#171; MoneySense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-468354</guid>
		<description>[...] 2Q-2008 Report Card [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2Q-2008 Report Card [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How many asset classes?</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-154071</link>
		<dc:creator>How many asset classes?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-154071</guid>
		<description>[...] A strong equity bias means that the maximum number of asset classes should be far less than 20. The Sleepy Portfolio, for instance, has only eight asset classes &#8212; cash, short-term bonds, real-return bonds, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A strong equity bias means that the maximum number of asset classes should be far less than 20. The Sleepy Portfolio, for instance, has only eight asset classes &#8212; cash, short-term bonds, real-return bonds, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linking Sunday Weight Loss Success Edition &#124; Personal Finance Blog by Money Ning</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-140662</link>
		<dc:creator>Linking Sunday Weight Loss Success Edition &#124; Personal Finance Blog by Money Ning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-140662</guid>
		<description>[...] Always interested in other people&#8217;s portfolio so take a peek at Canadian Capitalist&#8217;s Q2 report card! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Always interested in other people&#8217;s portfolio so take a peek at Canadian Capitalist&#8217;s Q2 report card! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-140198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-140198</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;  it is best to stick to the original asset allocation plan and occasionally rebalance the portfolio.

Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;  it is best to stick to the original asset allocation plan and occasionally rebalance the portfolio.</p>
<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-140197</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-140197</guid>
		<description>Pragmatic: We&#039;re talking about asset classes here, not stocks where you want to &quot;cut your losses&quot; and &quot;ride your winners&quot;. I firmly believe that you cannot time the markets, so it is best to stick to the original asset allocation plan and occasionally rebalance the portfolio. Even if I didn&#039;t sell a little bit of XIC, there is still excess cash to be deployed and the logical place is the asset classes that are below the target set out initially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pragmatic: We&#8217;re talking about asset classes here, not stocks where you want to &#8220;cut your losses&#8221; and &#8220;ride your winners&#8221;. I firmly believe that you cannot time the markets, so it is best to stick to the original asset allocation plan and occasionally rebalance the portfolio. Even if I didn&#8217;t sell a little bit of XIC, there is still excess cash to be deployed and the logical place is the asset classes that are below the target set out initially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pragmatic</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-140144</link>
		<dc:creator>Pragmatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-140144</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure you should be adding to your losing positions at this time.  The Canadian markets continues to be poised to go up and the US markets are poised to go down.  You&#039;re selling your winners to chase losers.  

Although this strategy may *eventually* work, I think it&#039;s still best to remain in Canada or other resource focused countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure you should be adding to your losing positions at this time.  The Canadian markets continues to be poised to go up and the US markets are poised to go down.  You&#8217;re selling your winners to chase losers.  </p>
<p>Although this strategy may *eventually* work, I think it&#8217;s still best to remain in Canada or other resource focused countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-140142</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-140142</guid>
		<description>Actually, next week&#039;s tour of ETFs will cover XIU/XIC followed by XSP and XIN in subsequent weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, next week&#8217;s tour of ETFs will cover XIU/XIC followed by XSP and XIN in subsequent weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-140141</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-140141</guid>
		<description>Either would be a good choice. XIU is cheaper and more liquid but XIC is tracks the broad index and more importantly the weight of a single stock is capped at 10%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either would be a good choice. XIU is cheaper and more liquid but XIC is tracks the broad index and more importantly the weight of a single stock is capped at 10%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-140139</link>
		<dc:creator>Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-140139</guid>
		<description>CC, you may have answered this before, but why did you choose XIC over XIU?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC, you may have answered this before, but why did you choose XIC over XIU?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2q-2008-report-card/#comment-140135</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/?p=979#comment-140135</guid>
		<description>Terry: It&#039;s true that US Equities have performed poorly over the last 10 years - the total return for the S&amp;P 500 in C$ is 2.09% compared to 9.5% for the TSX Composite and 5.1% for the MSCI EAFE.

But that isn&#039;t the reason to give up because we don&#039;t know which asset class will out perform or under perform in the &lt;em&gt;next 10 years&lt;/em&gt;. And one thing is certain - we will be glad we held some asset classes and wish we hadn&#039;t heard about some others. The trouble is it&#039;s impossible to say which is which today. That&#039;s why we diversify. If we know already which asset class would be a star performer, we would load up on it and forget about the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry: It&#8217;s true that US Equities have performed poorly over the last 10 years &#8211; the total return for the S&#038;P 500 in C$ is 2.09% compared to 9.5% for the TSX Composite and 5.1% for the MSCI EAFE.</p>
<p>But that isn&#8217;t the reason to give up because we don&#8217;t know which asset class will out perform or under perform in the <em>next 10 years</em>. And one thing is certain &#8211; we will be glad we held some asset classes and wish we hadn&#8217;t heard about some others. The trouble is it&#8217;s impossible to say which is which today. That&#8217;s why we diversify. If we know already which asset class would be a star performer, we would load up on it and forget about the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

