You may want to check out Jon Chevreau’s interview with finance professor Ziv Bodie, author of “Worry-Free Investing”, who calls into question most of todays widely held financial wisdom:
- Prof. Bodie argues that ordinary investors do not have to take any stock market risk when there is a safe, guaranteed long-term investment in the form of real return bonds.
- He doesn’t view stocks or gold as inflation hedges and points out that REITs have a slightly positive correlation with inflation but cannot be counted on to go up in proportion to inflation.
- Prof. Bodie points out that since you can’t get a higher return without taking on higher risk, the investment industry’s claim that people can just save less and invest in stocks for the long-term is a lie. By taking risk, investors are also exposed to the possibility that they could do worse.
- He calls the conventional wisdom that over the long-term there is little risk in equities as a fallacy. “If you spread risk across uncorrelated assets then yes you get diversification of risk but over time there is no diversification because the good years don’t necessarily cancel out the bad”.
Having read The Four Pillars of Investing in which William Bernstein warns against extrapolating recent experience ad infinitum, I wasn’t terribly surprised by Prof. Bodie’s interview. “Worry-Free Investing” is now on my “to read” list and I hope Mr. Chevreau will post the rest of the interview.
Note: If you haven’t done so already, you may want to enter your name in the third anniversary giveaway. Your odds of winning are much better than the 6/49 and best of all, there is no ticket to buy!
Bookmark: del.icio.us Digg StumbleUpon
8 responses so far ↓
1 FourPillars // Nov 26, 2007 at 9:51 pm
The problem (as I see it) with getting returns that equal inflation is that you have save a heck of a lot more dough in order to retire compared to if you are getting 4% after-inflation return (which is what I’m assuming).
Another problem might be the fact that the inflation index that the RR bonds are adjusted to might not be all that accurate compared to your personal inflation rate.
Mike
2 Canadian Capitalist // Nov 27, 2007 at 10:19 am
Mike: Personally, I’m assuming a 4% real return from my portfolio (which is tilted heavily towards equities) as well. But, I think the point Prof. Brodie is making is that by being in equities and expecting a higher return, we are taking a bit of risk that our returns could be lower than if we were in RRBs. I’m actually fine with that because with more than two decades away from retirement, I can be flexible or work a little bit.
One more thing about being entirely in RRBs is taxation. The income as well as the imputed inflation adjustment is taxed as ordinary income, so RRBs are suitable only inside a RRSP.
3 Richard // Nov 27, 2007 at 12:33 pm
I’m sure there’s good arguments for this, but there seem to be some problems with the idea. Like Mike I would prefer the highest reliable return over the long term, but wanting success doesn’t necessarily make the stock market perform well.
What does is the history of risk dimishing over time - most of the risk in a stable stock market seems to be from short-term liquidity (you can sell but there’s bad times to do so) and market timing gone bad. Having the value of the whole stock market decline for a long period would take some pretty big changes.
If you’re worried that the stock market in a certain country won’t provide the highest returns, or that the economy won’t be stable, there’s lots of other countries to pick from. Unless things get really bad it’s not wrong to assume short-term volatility and long-term gains above bonds (the reward for having your money locked in) which means the worst thing that would happen is a good buying opportunity.
4 FourPillars // Nov 27, 2007 at 10:13 pm
Richard, I think you are making a reasonable assumption that over the long term ie 20-30 years, stock returns will probably be higher than RRBs. However, as CC said, it’s not guaranteed.
I think Brodie’s strategy is more suited for someone who just can’t handle any uncertainty. I think one of the biggest uncertainties of retirement involves how long you will live and the quality of that life, rather than the investment returns.
Mike
5 on real return bonds — award tour // Nov 28, 2007 at 3:43 am
[...] Interview with Ziv Brodie on Real Return Bonds. Brodie wrote a book saying people should avoid the risk of equity markets in retirement accounts and instead use real return bonds which are priced to inflation. Something to think about once I’m back in Canada. [...]
6 Jon Chevreau // Dec 7, 2007 at 5:26 pm
The correct spelling is Zvi Bodie. Somehow a copy editor ended up inserting an R and made it Brodie but this should have been corrected in the online edition.
As for the rest of the interview …. we’ll see.
7 Canadian Capitalist // Dec 12, 2007 at 4:09 pm
Jon: I should have double checked the name. Thanks for pointing it out. I have Prof. Bodie’s book out from the library. Looking forward to reading it over the holidays.
8 Book Review: Worry-Free Investing // Feb 19, 2008 at 7:59 am
[...] borrowed this book (affiliate link) from the local library after reading Jon Chevreau’s interview with one of the authors - Ziv Bodie. Prof. Bodie and co-author Michael Clowes suggest that investors would be better off eschewing [...]
Leave a Comment