<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1Q-2008 Report Card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/</link>
	<description>Helping you invest and prosper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:27:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This and That</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-140385</link>
		<dc:creator>This and That</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-140385</guid>
		<description>[...] funds was -4.25% compared to -2.84% for the TSX Composite Index. I should also point out that the Sleepy Portfolio lost a miniscule -0.7% due to the 25% allocated to low-risk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] funds was -4.25% compared to -2.84% for the TSX Composite Index. I should also point out that the Sleepy Portfolio lost a miniscule -0.7% due to the 25% allocated to low-risk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-135435</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-135435</guid>
		<description>The Sleepy Portfolio benchmark is assumed to be in a RRSP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sleepy Portfolio benchmark is assumed to be in a RRSP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-135433</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-135433</guid>
		<description>CC is this portfolio assembled as an RRSP or a taxable portfolio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC is this portfolio assembled as an RRSP or a taxable portfolio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-133071</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-133071</guid>
		<description>Yves: The problem with VEU is that it includes a weighting of Canada at 5.4%, which is redundant for Canadian investors. IMO, VEA + VWO provides all the world ex-US exposure that a Canadian investor needs. Thanks for the post idea. I&#039;ll add it to my list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yves: The problem with VEU is that it includes a weighting of Canada at 5.4%, which is redundant for Canadian investors. IMO, VEA + VWO provides all the world ex-US exposure that a Canadian investor needs. Thanks for the post idea. I&#8217;ll add it to my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-133046</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-133046</guid>
		<description>CC,

I see in your report card you have (VTI) which is a nice all in one package for the US. What are you thoughts on the (VEU) All World Ex-US. I think this ETF started up in 2007 so it&#039;s fairly new, however do you think this would be a justifiable replacement for the XIC,VEA,VWO? I will be setting up an mix of ETF&#039;s in the near future and would like your input on the (VEU). Maybe this can be a future topic for posting.

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC,</p>
<p>I see in your report card you have (VTI) which is a nice all in one package for the US. What are you thoughts on the (VEU) All World Ex-US. I think this ETF started up in 2007 so it&#8217;s fairly new, however do you think this would be a justifiable replacement for the XIC,VEA,VWO? I will be setting up an mix of ETF&#8217;s in the near future and would like your input on the (VEU). Maybe this can be a future topic for posting.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-125341</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-125341</guid>
		<description>True, but YLO also fell much more than other stocks. Still, I am not complaining :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but YLO also fell much more than other stocks. Still, I am not complaining <img src='http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneygardener</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-125339</link>
		<dc:creator>moneygardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-125339</guid>
		<description>XDV is 8% off its recent low while YLO is 22% off its recent low.  I don&#039;t think it is jiving the the general market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XDV is 8% off its recent low while YLO is 22% off its recent low.  I don&#8217;t think it is jiving the the general market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-125305</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-125305</guid>
		<description>MG: I added just a little bit of YLO. The significant additions were VTI and VEA. Yeah, so far the YLO buy is looking good but so many stocks are up sharply over the past few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MG: I added just a little bit of YLO. The significant additions were VTI and VEA. Yeah, so far the YLO buy is looking good but so many stocks are up sharply over the past few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneygardener</title>
		<link>http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/1q-2008-report-card/#comment-125276</link>
		<dc:creator>moneygardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canadiancapitalist.com/2008/04/01/1q-2008-report-card#comment-125276</guid>
		<description>so you did end up adding some YLO...looking like that might have been a wise choice..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so you did end up adding some YLO&#8230;looking like that might have been a wise choice..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

